Optimising supplemental irrigation for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and the impact of plant bio-regulators in a semi-arid region of Deccan Plateau in India

G.C. Wakchaure, P.S. Minhas, P. Ratnakumar and R.L. Choudhary

Agricultural Water Management, 2016, vol. 172, issue C, 9-17

Abstract: Understanding the effects of water stress on yield formation is essential for planning irrigation and other mitigation strategies in arid and semiarid regions. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted for 3 years to evaluate the impact of irrigation regimes and plant bio-regulators (PBR’s) on grain yield and water productivity of spring wheat (Triticum aeastivum L). PBR’s applied through exogenous sprays included: 10mM thiourea (TU), 10μM salicylic acid (SA), 15gL−1 potassium nitrate (KNO3), 25ppm gibberellic acid (GA3), 8ppm ortho-silicic acid (OSA) at crown root initiation (CRI), flag leaf and seed milking stages and control (no PBR). Seven irrigation levels were generated through a line source sprinkler system (LSS) viz., application of irrigation water (IW) equalling 1.0, 0.85, 0.70, 0.55, 0.40, 0.25 and 0.10 times the CPE (cumulative open pan evaporation). The maximum yield obtained with PBR’s varied between 4.11–4.46Mgha−1 at IW:CPE 0.85 against 4.09Mgha−1 without PBR. While the yield decline equalled 0.35–0.42Mgha−1 for every 0.1 IW:CPE for PBR’s against 0.43Mgha−1 without PBR. The overall improvement in grain yield and total biomass with PBR’s ranged between 5.9–20.6% and 4.8–15.3%, respectively. Specifically TU and SA showed a major role under medium (IW:CPE 0.40–0.69) and severe (0.10–0.39) stress conditions in terms of maintenance of leaf water content, modulating the stomatal opening and better water usage and thereby improved yield by 0.41–0.88Mgha−1. The maximum water productivity ranged between 1.20–1.35kgm−3 with different PBR’s while it was 1.18kgm−3 without PBR and the latter could be achieved with 19–56% lesser irrigation water with PBR’s. Overall conclusions are that the effects of deficit irrigation could be substantially enhanced in terms of grain yield and water productivity when used conjunctively with PBR’s like TU and SA. Thus for integrating PBR’s with supplemental irrigation, large scale testing is required for defining their economic spray schedules under water scarcity conditions.

Keywords: Supplemental irrigation; Plant bio-regulators; Line source sprinkler (LSS); Water productivity; Water deficits (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837741630107X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:172:y:2016:i:c:p:9-17

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.004

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().