A table for five: Stakeholder perceptions of water governance in Alberta

Jenna Montgomery, Wei Xu, Henning Bjornlund and Jane Edwards

Agricultural Water Management, 2016, vol. 174, issue C, 11-21

Abstract: By the 1990s, the issue of sustainable management of water had become a global priority. By the end of the decade, the UN promoted the development of the Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) framework to assist governments in reaching water sustainability goals. With IWRM being the accepted method of managing water, traditional government led top-down management was observed to be insufficient to meet the demands of diverse stakeholders, inspiring a transition from government to governance. This transition emphasized inclusiveness, as well as active stakeholder participation in identifying problems and solutions. While governance has been readily adopted around the world, it has not been consistently defined, resulting in diverse understandings and applications that have focused on individual aspects such as economics or social justice, and making evaluations of governance systems difficult. To serve as criteria for evaluations, five pillars of good governance have been drawn from a systematic review of peer-reviewed and grey literature. These five pillars are then used to better understand and evaluate water governance under Alberta’s Water for Life (WFL) strategy; a water governance system that has been operational for over a decade. The evaluation is conducted using the Q-method to qualitatively and quantitatively identify distinct perspectives within the stakeholder population. Five perspectives emerged from the data, each reflecting unique values, priorities, and interests related to the water governance process and the five pillars of good governance. These perspectives provide insight into how each of these pillars operate in practice under WFL, and how they can be improved to enhance good governance.

Keywords: Water sharing; IWRM; Governance; Q-method; Canada (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377416301305
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:174:y:2016:i:c:p:11-21

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.04.013

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().