Estimation of crop coefficient of irrigated transplanted puddled rice by field scale water balance in the semi-arid Indo-Gangetic Plains, India
B.U. Choudhury and
Anil Kumar Singh
Agricultural Water Management, 2016, vol. 176, issue C, 142-150
Abstract:
Estimation of specific crop coefficient (kc) based on local climate, genotype and management conditions for irrigated rice will help in improving irrigation scheduling and water productivity. We estimated kc values of continuous flooded transplanted puddled rice (CFTPR) (cultivar Pusa-44) from field scale water balance measured actual crop evapotranspiration (AETc), Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration (kc1) and pan evaporation (kc2) losses in the Indo Gangetic Plains (IGP), New Delhi, India. Measured kc1 values ranged from 1.15–1.58, 1.44–1.75, 1.90–1.96, 1.59–1.82 and 1.0–1.41 at tillering (14–18 DAT), panicle initiation (27–34 DAT), flowering (62–65 DAT), physiological maturity (97–101 DAT) and harvesting (112–113 DAT), respectively. Based on FAO-56 defined stages, the measured kc1 values were 1.06–1.120 for initial (kc-ini), 1.73–1.88 at mid- (kc-mid) and 1.36–1.45 at end-season (kc-end) growth. Due to higher pan evaporation (8–11%) losses over estimated reference evapotranspiration of grass surface, the measured kc2 values at initial and end- seasons were 2–5% less while at mid-season, it was 7–8% less than kc1. The FAO-56 climate adjusted model improved kc-ini by 9.5% but improved kc-mid and kc-end values only marginally (<2.5%) over FAO-56 climate unadjusted model. As a result, FAO-56 climate adjusted model considerably under-estimated kc-mid by 42–53% and kc-end by 50–58% over measured kc values (kc1 &kc2) while kc-ini value (1.15) was comparable to measured kc values during both the seasons. Measured kc values suggest adjustment of available FAO-56 model derived kc values by 1.30–1.53 times at mid-and 1.40–1.60 times at -end seasons of CFTPR ecosystems for improving irrigation scheduling and water productivity in semi-arid and other similar agro-ecological regions.
Keywords: Transplanted rice; Field water balance; Crop coefficient; Evapotranspiration; Irrigation; Indo-Gangetic plain (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377416301895
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:176:y:2016:i:c:p:142-150
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.05.027
Access Statistics for this article
Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns
More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().