Performance of partial root-zone drip irrigation for sugar beet production in a semi-arid area

Ramazan Topak, Bilal Acar, Refik Uyanöz and Ercan Ceyhan

Agricultural Water Management, 2016, vol. 176, issue C, 180-190

Abstract: Partial root-zone drying (PRD), a water-saving irrigation strategy, is being tested in many field crops species. In this study, the effects of PRD on root yield, sugar yield, water use efficiency (WUE), and fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency (FNUE) of field-grown sugar beet were compared with those of conventional deficit irrigation (CDI) and full irrigation (FI). The experiments were conducted at Konya-Çumra, a Central Anatolian region of Turkey, in 2012 and 2013. Five irrigation techniques were designed and three nitrogen levels were chosen for the current study. These five irrigation techniques were applied to the study crops with the help of a drip irrigation system. In FI (control), the irrigation water was applied to both sides of the root system such that 35–40% of the available soil moisture was consumed in the 0.90-m root zone. In CDI50 and CDI75, 50% and 75% irrigation water of FI, respectively, was supplied to both sides of the root system. In alternative PRD50 (APRD50), the half of the root system was exposed to soil drying and the other half was kept well-watered with 50% irrigation water of FI. In fixed PRD50 (FPRD50), 50% irrigation water of FI was supplied only to half of the fixed side of the root system. Furthermore, the three chosen nitrogen levels included N100, where the plant’s nitrogen requirement is met completely; N75, where 25% reduction was made in the plant’s nitrogen requirement; and N50, where 50% reduction was made in the plant’s nitrogen requirement. Although the effect of nitrogen levels on sugar beet root and sugar yields was not significant, irrigation treatments had a significant effect (5% of the level). Compared to the FI treatment, the CDI75, CDI50, APRD50, and FPRD50 treatments decreased the standardized root and sugar yields by 6.36%, 26.97%, 19.12%, and 23.50%, respectively. APRD50 and FPRD50 increased the standardized yield by 10.74% and 4.75% compared to CDI50, respectively. In addition, when same amount of irrigation water was used, PRD (APRD50 and FPRD50) treatments outperformed CDI50 in WUE and FNUE of sugar beets. Compared to FI and CDI50, APRD50 increased WUEroot by 19.8% and 8.5% and FNUEroot by 26.2% and 68.2%, respectively. The varying nitrogen levels had a significant effect on FNUEroot and FNUEsugar. The highest FNUEroot and FNUEsugar values were obtained with N50. Further, combinations of different irrigation treatments and nitrogen levels had a significant effect on FNUEroot.

Keywords: PRD deficit irrigation; Deficit nitrogen; Root and sugar yields; Water saving (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377416302098
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:176:y:2016:i:c:p:180-190

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.06.004

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().