Simulation of crop evapotranspiration and crop coefficients with data in weighing lysimeters

Saseendran S. Anapalli, Lajpat R. Ahuja, Prasanna H. Gowda, Liwang Ma, Gary Marek, Steven R. Evett and Terry A. Howell

Agricultural Water Management, 2016, vol. 177, issue C, 274-283

Abstract: Accurate quantification of crop evapotranspiration (ET) is critical to optimizing irrigation water productivity, especially, in the semiarid regions of the world where limited rainfall is supplemented by irrigation for crop production. In this context, cropping system models are potential tools for predicting ET or crop water requirements in agriculture across soils and climates and assist in developing decision support tools for irrigation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of RZWQM2 simulated ET for fully irrigated silage (2006 and 2007) and grain corn (1990) against measured crop water use and soil evaporation with large weighing lysimeters in the Texas High Plains. An extended Shuttleworth and Wallace method was used to estimate potential crop ET (E and T) demand in RZWQM2. The Nimah and Hanks approach was used for crop water uptake and Richard’s Equation for soil water redistribution modeling. Simulations of biomass, leaf area index, soil water storage, and ET were reasonably close to the measured data. Root Mean Squared Deviation (RMSD) for corn biomass was between 1 and 2.1 MT ha−1, LAI between 0.33 and 0.88, water in the soil between 2 and 2.9cm for a 190cm soil profile, and actual daily crop ET between 1.0 to 1.5mm across the three years of measured data. Arithmetic mean deviation (MD) for ET ranged from −0.10 to 0.40mm. Fallow soil evaporation before and after corn planting was simulated within MD of −0.03–0.003mm. The crop coefficients (Kc) calculated with measured ET and the short grass or alfalfa crop reference ET methods varied from year to year. The Kc values obtained by using the simulated ET and alfalfa reference ET were close to Kc values using measured ET, within RMSD of 0.17, and could be used to obtain long-term average Kc values for scheduling irrigation.

Keywords: Evapotranspiration; Crop coefficient; Lysimeter; Agricultural system model; Irrigation; Water management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377416302931
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:177:y:2016:i:c:p:274-283

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.08.009

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().