EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Effects of two slow-release nitrogen fertilizers and irrigation on yield, quality, and water-fertilizer productivity of greenhouse tomato

Yanmei Li, Yanxin Sun, Shangqiang Liao, Guoyuan Zou, Tongke Zhao, Yanhua Chen, Jungang Yang and Lin Zhang

Agricultural Water Management, 2017, vol. 186, issue C, 139-146

Abstract: Technical research on efficient water and nitrogen use is crucial for sustainable agricultural development. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the combined effects of two slow-release nitrogen fertilizers (polymer-coated urea (PU) and carbon-based urea (CU)) and two different irrigation water levels (conventional irrigation, CI; 90% of conventional irrigation, RI) on tomato yield, quality, and water-fertilizer productivity. Tomato yield and irrigation water productivity improved when nitrogen fertilizer was applied. Compared with U application, CU application increased tomato fruit diameter, volume, single-fruit weight, yield, and water-fertilizer productivity, therefore increasing yield by 4600kgha−1 and net income from tomato cultivation by 6313yuanha−1. Treatment with the two slow-release nitrogen fertilizers increased soluble sugar and lycopene contents and reduced nitrate content in fruits. Compared with U treatment, PU and CU treatments decreased total nitrate nitrogen residue in the 0–100cm soil layer. Compared with CI, RI significantly reduced tomato yield and net incomes under PU treatment, whereas RI did not significantly reduce tomato yield and net income under CU treatment. RI increased fruit Vc (vitamin C) and lycopene contents. Results of the study indicated that polymer-coated slow-release fertilizers may have great potential for widespread use because they improved tomato fruit quality while reducing the environmental risks caused by soil nitrogen. In addition, carbon-based, slow-release nitrogen fertilizers promise to improve fruit quality, yield, water-fertilizer productivity, and benefits associated with tomato cultivation. These fertilizers also reduce environmental risks caused by soil nitrogen and help reduce irrigation water consumption while sustaining normal tomato growth and fruit yield, making their promotion extremely beneficial.

Keywords: Tomato; Carbon-based urea; Polymer-coated urea; Conventional irrigation; Reduced irrigation; Interactive effects (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377417300471
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:186:y:2017:i:c:p:139-146

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.02.006

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:186:y:2017:i:c:p:139-146