Seasonal variation of reference evapotranspiration and Priestley-Taylor coefficient in the eastern Free State, South Africa

Mphethe I. Tongwane, Michael J. Savage, Mitsuru Tsubo and Mokhele E. Moeletsi

Agricultural Water Management, 2017, vol. 187, issue C, 122-130

Abstract: Estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is crucial in crop production practices and other hydrological processes. The hourly FAO-56 Penman-Monteith (EToPM) method was used to calculate ETo at Bergville, Bethlehem and Harrismith in the eastern Free State, South Africa. Priestley-Taylor evapotranspiration coefficients (PTc) were estimated using EToPM and equilibrium evapotranspiration. The study establishes that for the mountainous semi-arid areas, aerodynamic conditions are major contributors of evapotranspiration. The aerodynamic component of EToPM is generally a dominant contributor varying between 50% and 70% of the total EToPM depending on the season and location. Dry and windy atmospheric conditions that reach their highest levels during the spring season cause water vapour pressure deficit to be a parameter with greater influence on ETo. The study further shows that the impact of solar irradiance on ETo decreases with altitude in the study area. More than 87% of EToPM from aerodynamic resistance is experienced during daytime. Agricultural water resources management activities need to consider the importance of nocturnal EToPM which contributes between 10–14% of total daily ETo depending on the station. Geometry of a surface affects total solar irradiance received at a place and the associated ETo. The commonly used average Priestley-Taylor constant of 1.26 under-estimates evaporation rates in the semi-arid environments. This study shows that the coefficients are highly variable during winter and spring, less variable in autumn, and that topoclimate has a significant impact on the PTc variability. This variability reflects a direct influence that the dry atmospheric environments of the semi-arid regions have on PTc, which is a limitation of the use of the 1.26 coefficient.

Keywords: Aerodynamic evaporation; Net irradiance; Radiative evaporation; Water vapour pressure deficit (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377417300926
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:187:y:2017:i:c:p:122-130

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.03.013

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().