Assessing potato transpiration, yield and water productivity under various water regimes and planting dates using the FAO dual Kc approach

Paula Paredes, D’Agostino, Daniela, Mahdi Assif, Mladen Todorovic and Luis S. Pereira

Agricultural Water Management, 2018, vol. 195, issue C, 11-24

Abstract: Two years of experimental field data on potato (var. Spunta) were used to calibrate and validate the SIMDualKc model. This model adopts the FAO dual Kc approach that provides the partition of crop evapotranspiration into crop transpiration and soil evaporation. Results of model calibration show a good agreement between soil water observations and predictions, with low errors of estimate – RMSE <3.7% of the mean observed soil water – and high modelling efficiency (>0.87). The calibrated basal crop coefficients for the initial stage, mid-season and end of season are 0.15, 1.10 and 0.35, respectively. After model calibration, the crop transpiration simulations were used to derive the yield response factor (Ky=1.09). Coupling SIMDualKc with the Stewart’s model provided for a good prediction of yields, with NRMSE lower than 8%. Irrigation scheduling scenarios were simulated with SIMDualKc model for various planting dates and limited stress conditions. Related results have shown that anticipating planting dates to the second half of February could lead to less irrigation requirements, higher yields and better water productivity relative to consumptive water use (WPET), crop transpiration (WPT) and seasonal water use (WPWU). These WP indicators were useful comparators. Contrarily, the WP relative to season irrigation depths (WPIrrig) showed a great variation among scenarios and a tendency to be higher when deficit irrigation was applied, which contradicts the objectives of farmers in terms of obtaining high yields and economic returns. The model and methodologies used were adequate to support irrigation management advising for farmers.

Keywords: Basal crop coefficients; Partitioning actual evapotranspiration; Consumptive use water productivity; Water saving; Deficit irrigation; Stewart’s water-yield model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377417303062
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:195:y:2018:i:c:p:11-24

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.09.011

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().