EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessing the performance of different irrigation systems on winter wheat under limited water supply

Qin Fang, Xiying Zhang, Liwei Shao, Suying Chen and Hongyong Sun

Agricultural Water Management, 2018, vol. 196, issue C, 133-143

Abstract: The rapid decline of groundwater table is threatening sustainable irrigation agricultural development in the North China Plain (NCP). Optimized irrigation scheduling and water-saving irrigation technologies need to be developed to reduce irrigation water use and maintain the grain production potential for the region. This study was conducted at Luancheng experimental station in the NCP during 2012–2015 to evaluate the effects of different irrigation methods (basin irrigation, BI; tube-sprinkler irrigation, SI; pillow irrigation, PI and drip irrigation, DI) with various irrigation amount/frequency on yield, economic returns and water use efficiency (WUE) of winter wheat. Under the same limited irrigation amount (90mm/season), two irrigation applications (45mm/application) conducted using DI significantly increased the yield and WUE as compared with the BI using one single application. Increasing the seasonal irrigation amount to 160mm, the increase in the application frequency by reducing the irrigation amount per application didn’t significantly affect the yield using either PI or SI. Results showed that soil water depletion (SWD) contributed 40–60% of the seasonal evapotranspiration (ET) under limited water supply. The smaller root length density (RLD) in deep layers of the soil restricted the soil water uptake by the crop. Therefore, increasing irrigation frequency would maintain the top soil layers with higher soil water contents where RLD was greater that improved crop water use and yield under limited water supply. However, when irrigation water was plentiful, micro-irrigation methods did not increase yields. Due to the high cost in installation of the three micro-irrigation systems, their net income was reduced by 30% as compared with the BI method. The economic water productivity ratio (EWPR) was only 3–4 for the three micro-irrigation systems, much less than the basin irrigation method, which had an average value of 16. Currently, the basin irrigation method is more economic for growing winter wheat in the NCP.

Keywords: Water use efficiency; Irrigation frequency; Basin irrigation; Tube-sprinkler irrigation; Pillow irrigation; Drip irrigation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377417303578
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:196:y:2018:i:c:p:133-143

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.11.005

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:196:y:2018:i:c:p:133-143