EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Inter-seasonal and cross-treatment variability in single-crop coefficients for rice evapotranspiration estimation and their validation under drying-wetting cycle conditions

Yuping Lv, Junzeng Xu, Shihong Yang, Xiaoyin Liu, Jiangang Zhang and Yijiang Wang

Agricultural Water Management, 2018, vol. 196, issue C, 154-161

Abstract: A two-year experiment was conducted to investigate the inter-seasonal and cross-treatment variability in measured rice evapotranspiration (ETcMea), measured single-crop coefficients (KcMea), and treatment-specific calibrated coefficients (KcCal), under different drying-wetting cycles in a subtropical monsoon climate in East China. For each drying-wetting treatment, ETcMea was determined based on data collected in lysimeters, and KcMea was calculated from ETcMea, reference evapotranspiration, and soil moisture deficit coefficient. Following the single-crop coefficient method, KcCal was determined by matching KcMea. In 2012 and 2013, ETcMea varied from 459.5 to 486.7mm, and 544.5–605.1mm, respectively. Its inter-seasonal variability was larger than the cross-treatment variability. Stage-wise average KcMea were 1.07–1.17, 1.30–1.51, 1.49–1.54, and 1.17-1.29 in 2012, and 1.06–1.12, 1.31–1.49, 1.43–1.57, and 1.26–1.27 in 2013 during the initial, crop development, mid-season, and late season stages, respectively. Treatment-specific KcCal were calibrated as 1.09–1.20, 1.51–1.60, and 0.74–0.78 in 2012, and 1.05–1.14, 1.47–1.64, and 0.96–1.01 in 2013 for the initial, mid-season, and end-season stages, respectively. The inter-seasonal and cross-treatment variability in KcMea and KcCal was low. Each treatment-specific KcCal set performed similarly when rice ETc was calculated under different drying-wetting treatments. Cross validation indicated that large daily uncertainty in ETc estimation occurred when daily ETcMea was high, and uncertainty in seasonal ETc calculated using different treatment-specific KcCal sets ranged from 45.7 to 60.1mm (approximate to one irrigation). Calibrating KcCal using more data (season-specificKcCal or mixed treatment KcCal) would improve the accuracy of KcCal in ETc estimation.

Keywords: Variability; Cross validation; Single-crop coefficients; Drying-wetting cycles; Rice evapotranspiration; Uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837741730358X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:196:y:2018:i:c:p:154-161

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.11.006

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:196:y:2018:i:c:p:154-161