Performance assessment of factory and field calibrations for electromagnetic sensors in a loam soil

J. Singh, T. Lo, D.R. Rudnick, T.J. Dorr, C.A. Burr, R. Werle, T.M. Shaver and F. Muñoz-Arriola

Agricultural Water Management, 2018, vol. 196, issue C, 87-98

Abstract: Accurate continuous measurements of temperature (T), apparent electrical conductivity (ECa), apparent dielectric permittivity (εra), and volumetric water content (θv) are extremely valuable to irrigation management and other agronomic decisions. The performance of eight electromagnetic (EM) sensors (TDR315, CS655, HydraProbe2, 5TE, EC5, CS616, Field Connect, AquaCheck), were analyzed through a field study in a loam soil. T, ECa, and εra were compared in reference to overall average among all sensors, and θv in reference to a neutron moisture meter (NMM). The reported T and ECa difference among the sensors were within 1°C and 1dSm−1, respectively, at 0.15 and 0.76m depths. Among the single-sensor probes, the range of depth-combined (0.15 and 0.76m) RMSD for factory calibration varied from 0.039m3m−3 (5TE) to 0.157m3m−3 (CS616). In comparison to single-sensor probes, RMSD of Field Connect at combined depths (0.30 and 0.51m) was moderate (0.083m3m−3), and RMSD of AquaCheck at combined depths (0.30 and 0.61m) was high (0.163m3m−3). Regression calibrations improved θv accuracy substantially beyond factory calibrations, as RMSD of the evaluated sensors except Field Connect was below 0.025m3m−3 using regression calibrations. The betterment in θv accuracy gained by using offset calibrations was smaller and less consistent than the improvements gained by using regression calibrations. The lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval for mean RMSD of most sensors were below 0.02 and 0.04m3m−3, respectively, when using depth-specific offset calibrations. The relative success of offset calibrations for certain sensors in this study is encouraging and may signal new opportunities. Because much of the uncertainty in sensor-reported θv for the sensors under evaluation was systematic, future work should aim to develop universal calibrations or facilitate site-specific calibrations.

Keywords: Calibration; Capacitance; Electrical conductivity; Neutron; Permittivity; Soil water content (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377417303463
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:196:y:2018:i:c:p:87-98

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.10.020

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().