Multi-indicator assessment of a water-saving agricultural engineering project in North Beijing, China

Long Liang, Rattan Lal, Bradley G. Ridoutt, Guishen Zhao, Zhangliu Du, Li Li, Dangyang Feng, Liyuan Wang, Peng Peng, Sheng Hang and Wenliang Wu

Agricultural Water Management, 2018, vol. 200, issue C, 34-46

Abstract: The Paddy Land-to-Dry Land (PLDL) program was a 10-year long (2006–2015) agricultural engineering program, initiated jointly by Beijing and Heibei Province, that was designed to increase urban water availability and improve household livelihoods in local farming communities. The program, supported by government subsidy, involved conversion of paddy (Oryza sativa) to maize (Zea mays). In this study, a range of environmental, social and economic indicators were used to evaluate the program. In relation to its primary goal of saving water, the program was considered successful, with water consumption of maize production 47% lower. The subsidy was also found to be influential in encouraging household participation. However, the small size of household farms and the small proportion of household revenues coming from agricultural production meant that the PLDL program did little to directly improve household livelihoods. Environmental indicators, assessed using life cycle assessment, showed mixed results. Although most indicators improved, some deteriorated, namely acidification and eutrophication potential. This highlights the importance of assessing environmental performance comprehensively to avoid burden shifting. Important environmental impacts could potentially have been reduced if the program had provided additional technological support to farmers. Nevertheless, the aggregated LCA results suggested that overall environmental performance was improved. The PLDL program could also be viewed as a success from the perspective that the monetarized ecosystem service benefits greatly exceeded the subsidy payment. An important spillover benefit was that participating households were able to achieve greater participation in non-farm employment, which contributed to higher household incomes and poverty alleviation. An important finding of this study is that an agricultural engineering program designed to alleviate water scarcity can have wide ranging environmental, economic and social impacts.

Keywords: Ecological engineering; Energy efficiency; Life cycle assessment; Environment load; Economic performance; Social impact (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418300374
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:200:y:2018:i:c:p:34-46

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.01.007

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().