Low-pressure sprinkler irrigation in maize: Differences in water distribution above and below the crop canopy

N. Zapata, O. Robles, E. Playán, P. Paniagua, C. Romano, R. Salvador and F. Montoya

Agricultural Water Management, 2018, vol. 203, issue C, 353-365

Abstract: Reducing the working pressure at the sprinkler nozzles is one of the alternatives to reduce energy requirements in solid-set sprinkler irrigation systems. Previous studies reported ≈10% lower seasonal Christiansen uniformity coefficient (CUC) for low-pressure treatments than for standard treatments, but no differences in maize yield. This research analyses the effect of maize canopy water partitioning on irrigation performance indexes (CUC and wind drift and evaporation losses, WDEL). Three irrigation treatments were considered, based on the working pressure: 1) A standard brass impact sprinkler operating at a pressure of 300 kPa (CIS300); 2) A standard brass impact sprinkler operating at a pressure of 200 kPa (CIS200); and 3) A modified plastic impact sprinkler (with a deflecting plate attached to the drive arm) operating at a pressure of 200 kPa (DPIS200). Irrigation performance was measured using a catch-can network located above the maize canopy (CUCac, WDELac) along the whole crop season and using stemflow and throughfall devices below the maize canopy (CUCbc, WDELbc) in eight irrigation events. Maize growth, yield and its components were measured. Under low-wind and fully developed canopy conditions (a frequent situation for maize irrigation), CUCbc resulted higher than CUCac for the low-pressure treatments, while the opposite was observed for the standard pressure treatment. Maize canopy partitioning reduces the differences in irrigation performance indexes between pressure treatments, explaining why there are no differences in grain yield between them. Caution should be used when measuring sprinkler irrigation performance above tall canopies, since the elevation of the catch-cans and the crop canopy partitioning affect performance estimations.

Keywords: Catch-cans; Stemflow; Throughfall; Irrigation uniformity; Low-pressure; Wind drift and evaporation losses (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418302014
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:203:y:2018:i:c:p:353-365

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.03.025

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().