Simulating crop yield, surface runoff, tile drainage and phosphorus loss in a clay loam soil of the Lake Erie region using EPIC

Zhaozhi Wang, T.Q. Zhang, C.S. Tan, R.A.J. Taylor, X. Wang, Z.M. Qi and T. Welacky

Agricultural Water Management, 2018, vol. 204, issue C, 212-221

Abstract: Useful in evaluating best management practices and nutrient management planning, the prediction of phosphorus (P) transfer from agricultural lands to water bodies via surface runoff and tile drainage remains as a challenge, as few models can provide reasonably accurate P loss simulations. The EPIC (Environmental Policy Integrated Climate) model was firstly applied to simulate crop yields, surface runoff, tile drainage, and dissolved reactive P (DRP) losses under a corn-soybean rotation grown on a “cracking” Brookston clay loam soil (Vertisol) in the Lake Erie basin, Ontario, Canada. Different potential evapotranspiration and curve number equations were compared to determine the most suitable equations (Penman-Monteith equation and variable Daily Curve Number with soil moisture index) for this region. A crack flow coefficient was used to deal with inflow partitioned to cracks. A soil layer below tile drain with low saturated hydraulic conductivity was employed in simulating the experimental site, where most water was leaving the field through tile drain. Lateral subsurface flow was used to substitute for drainage. Annual simulations of crop grain yield, cumulative surface runoff, and cumulative drainage closely matched observed data. Over shorter periods (months), surface runoff (NSE = 0.78), tile drainage (NSE = 0.57), and relevant DRP loss (NSE > 0.5) simulations were satisfactory, except for two periods of DRP loss in surface runoff, where most DRP moved downward through lateral flow and deep percolation due to limitations in the crack flow coefficient. For this vertic soil, EPIC generally simulated crop yields and flow volumes well, while DRP losses were only adequately simulated.

Keywords: Modelling; Surface runoff; Tile drainage; Phosphorus loss; EPIC; Lake Erie (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418303949
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:204:y:2018:i:c:p:212-221

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.021

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().