EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Environmental and economic benefits of micro–field rain–harvesting farming system at maize (Zea mays L.) field scale in semiarid east African Plateau

Fei Mo, Jian-Yong Wang, Hong-Xu Ren, Guo-Jun Sun, Levis Kavagi, Hong Zhou, Simon N. Nguluu, Patrick Gicheru, Kiprotich W. Cheruiyot and You-Cai Xiong

Agricultural Water Management, 2018, vol. 206, issue C, 102-112

Abstract: To explore low–cost, high–yielding and environment–friendly rainfed farming technology is critical for sustainable agricultural development in semiarid east African Plateau (EAP). An innovative ridge–furrow mulching system (RFMS) was first introduced to EAP, with a two–year field experiment using maize cultivar KDVI in a typical semiarid site of Kenya from 2012 to 2013. Nine treatments were designed including ridge–furrow cultivation with black plastic mulching (RFB), straw mulching (RFS) and without mulching (RF) under high (375 kg ha−1), conventional (225 kg ha−1) and zero fertilization rates. We found RFB and RFS significantly increased soil water storage (0–40 cm) by 10.2% and 4.8%, while lowered evapotranspiration rate and improved thermal status, compared to RF across two growing seasons. Importantly, RFB and RFS increased soil organic carbon and C/N ratio (soil organic carbon/soil total nitrogen) by 7.8% and 4.9%, 7.2% and 5.1% respectively, following two growing seasons of farming practice. As expected, grain yield and water use efficiency (WUE) were averagely increased by 63.3% and 63.8%, 27.5% and 35.9% in RFB and RFS than those of RF respectively. Additionally, net income and economic output–to–input ratio were significantly greater in RFB and RFS than those of RF. On the other hand, conventional fertilization rate achieved similar grain yield and WUE as high fertilization did. Considering environmental and economic benefits, the RFMS farming system with conventional fertilization may act as a promising option to upgrade local dryland agricultural system in EAP.

Keywords: Rainfed farming; Soil quality; Economic benefit; Maize; east African Plateau (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418305390
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:206:y:2018:i:c:p:102-112

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.05.002

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:206:y:2018:i:c:p:102-112