Financial aspects of reclaimed wastewater irrigation in three sugarcane production areas in the Upper Cauca river Basin, Colombia

A. Galvis, M.F. Jaramillo, P. van der Steen and H.J. Gijzen

Agricultural Water Management, 2018, vol. 209, issue C, 102-110

Abstract: Treated wastewater may be reused for crop irrigation. This contributes to recovery of water and nutrients, and at the same time it helps to reduce pollution discharge to receiving water bodies. Despite these advantages of reuse of treated wastewater, there is little experience of this in Colombia and Latin America. In part, this condition is explained by the lack of studies that show the potential of reuse comparing the traditional wastewater treatment options without reuse versus the options with reuse. In this research, the financial viability of reuse of treated wastewater for the irrigation of sugarcane crops in the Upper Cauca river basin in Colombia was studied. The study included three cases, with different characteristics of wastewater (BOD5 between 164 and 233 mg/L), flows (between 369 and 7600 L/s), rainfall levels (between 1009 and 1459 mm/year) and irrigation requirements (0.34 and 1.08 L/s-ha). For both scenarios, the same baseline was considered. Cost-Benefit Analysis CBA was used to compare the options (with and without reuse of treated wastewater). Cost of initial investment and O&M were considered. Benefits were considered like avoided cost by use of fertilizers, reduction of taxes for water use and discharges directly to water bodies and investment and O&M costs of infrastructure for irrigation with groundwater. The results of the CBA and sensitivity analysis show that there are two key factors that influence financial viability of treated wastewater for sugarcane crop irrigation: 1) the water balance and irrigation requirements, and 2) costs corresponding to the management of wastewater for agricultural irrigation, including additional treatment (if it is required) and the infrastructure to bring the treated wastewater to crops. The financial viability of reuse in the study area was limited because the values of tax for wastewater discharges and water tariffs in Colombia do not correspond to the values they should have.

Keywords: Agricultural irrigation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Wastewater reuse; Water pollution control; 3-SSA (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418310667
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:209:y:2018:i:c:p:102-110

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.019

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().