Simulation of irrigation return flow from a Triticale farm under sprinkler and furrow irrigation systems using experimental data: A case study in arid region

Seyed Mohammadreza Naghedifar, Ali Naghi Ziaei and Hossein Ansari

Agricultural Water Management, 2018, vol. 210, issue C, 185-197

Abstract: Irrigation return flow is an important and hard-to-estimate component of the groundwater balance equation. In this study, irrigation return flow from a Triticale farm under sprinkler and furrow irrigation systems was investigated in arid region. For the sake of accuracy, high-resolution (both temporally and spatially) datasets were provided through ten monitoring wells (eight two-meter-deep and two six-meter-deep monitoring wells) equipped with totally 76 soil moisture sensors. Moreover, dual crop coefficient approach was used for estimation of evapotranspiration in each experimental field due to its adaptability with short-interval data. The datasets were used for calibration and validation of HYDRUS-1D software over about six months of Triticale growth period. The results showed an acceptable agreement between measured and simulated water content in each soil layer of furrow- (with RMSE and MAE equal to 0.035 and 0.031 cm3/cm3, respectively) and sprinkler-irrigated (with RMSE and MAE equal to 0.024 and 0.020 cm3/cm3, respectively) fields. HYDRUS simulations were also used for estimation of irrigation return flow. Results showed that in furrow-irrigated field, about 13.3 percent of inflows (including irrigation and precipitation) returns back to groundwater aquifer as irrigation return flow. However, that was negligible in sprinkler-irrigated field. The rationale behind different irrigation flows obtained for each experimental field was investigated using water balance components obtained by HYDRUS software. It was revealed that total water application depth and evapotranspiration was almost the same for both experimental fields. However, the intrinsic difference between the application intervals and in turn, application depths in each interval provoked more irrigation return flow in furrow-irrigated field. Eventually, sensitivity assessment was done to quantify the impact of soil hydraulic parameters on return flow. The results showed that the parameters which have the most impact on total amount of return flow are θs and n for furrow-irrigated field whereas in the case of sprinkler-irrigated field parameters showed inconsiderable impact on return flow. The fact which has root in different initial water content of each experimental field.

Keywords: Irrigation return flow; Neishabour; Deep vadose zone; HYDRUS-1D (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418311272
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:210:y:2018:i:c:p:185-197

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.036

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().