Irrigation management strategies to increase water productivity in Oryza sativa (rice) in Uruguay
G. Carracelas,
J. Hornbuckle,
J. Rosas and
A. Roel
Agricultural Water Management, 2019, vol. 222, issue C, 161-172
Abstract:
Traditional rice irrigation systems in Uruguay are fully irrigated and early continuously flooded irrigation accounts for a high volume of water used. The purpose of this study was to determine irrigation techniques that increase irrigation water productivity (WPi) allowing a reduction in water input without negatively affecting grain yield in Uruguay. Ten experiments were conducted over a six-year period from 2009 to 2015, in three experimental units located among the major rice growing regions. Treatments included: early continuous flooding (C), alternate wetting and drying (AWD), intermittent flooding until panicle initiation (IP) and intermittent flooding during all crop growth period (I). All treatments were planted on dry soil. In treatment C flooding started 15–20 days after emergence and a water layer of 10 cm above the soil surface was maintained throughout all the crop cycle. In treatments IP and I, the water level alternated between 10 cm and 0 cm and was re-established when the soil was still saturated. The AWD treatment allowed the soil to dry periodically (water depletion of 50% of soil available water) until panicle initiation. IP and I over three seasons led to significant savings in irrigation water inputs in the North and Central regions (averaged 35% or - 3986 m3 ha−1) in relation to C. In the East region, AWD allowed for a 29%(-2067 m3 ha−1) water saving in relation to the control over four seasons but determined a significant yield loss of 1339 kg rice ha−1 (15% reduction) in relation to C. WPi was increased by 0.25 kg m−3 (23%) in IP and 0.68 kg m−3 (62%) in I, in relation to the control C. Whole grain percentage was significantly reduced with I in the North region only. Techniques that maintained the soil water at saturated conditions like intermittent flooding, allowed a reduction of water input with no significant effects on grain yield, which led to a significant increase in WPi.
Keywords: Alternate wetting and drying; Intermittent; Yield; Quality; Water productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419306134
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:222:y:2019:i:c:p:161-172
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.05.049
Access Statistics for this article
Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns
More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().