Restricted water allocations: Landscape-scale energy balance simulations and adjustments in agricultural water applications

Ramesh Dhungel, Robert Aiken, Xiaomao Lin, Shannon Kenyon, Paul D. Colaizzi, Ray Luhman, R. Louis Baumhardt, O’Brien, Dan, Seth Kutikoff and David K. Brauer

Agricultural Water Management, 2020, vol. 227, issue C

Abstract: Research that incorporates information from satellites into conventional biophysical models has great importance and interest. Comprehensive crop water algorithms can help track crop stress, schedule irrigation, and acquire water right information for effective water management and increased productivity in semi-arid and arid environments. Overall objective was to utilize the automated biophysical surface energy balance model BAITSSS (Backward‐Averaged Iterative Two‐Source Surface temperature and energy balance Solution) to understand critical agricultural water management issues. BAITSSS served as an advanced digital landscape crop water tracker and irrigation scheduler to simulate hourly landscape evapotranspiration (ET) at 30 m spatial resolution. North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) weather data and Landsat-based vegetation indices were inputs of BAITSSS to simulate surface energy balance components along with irrigation (Irr). Two agricultural-dominated groundwater regions of northwest Kansas, USA within a section of the Ogallala aquifer were studied during a five-year period (2013–2017). We compared model-simulated irrigation to reported within water right management units (WRMU). The sum of reported irrigation and precipitation (P), representing in-season water supply, was also compared to model simulated ET as an indicator of well-watered ET. The model was able to simulate reasonably ET values, and irrigation quantities, and to differentiate various spatial distribution patterns of crops within WRMU. However, unknown water management, within WRMU, constrained explicit inference of actual ET and irrigation amounts. The model appears suitable for quantifying the upper bound of in-season water supply (irrigation plus P) expected for well-watered crops in the U.S. Central High Plains. A WRMU exhibiting significantly different in-season water supply than the simulated ET may present opportunities to modify irrigation rates or to gain inference about deficit irrigation.

Keywords: BAITSSS; water rights; irrigation scheduling; remote sensing; NLDAS; advanced geospatial modeling; next generation evapotranspiration; Ogallala Aquifer; crop water use; GMD4; Sheridan 6; LEMA (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419310005
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:227:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419310005

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105854

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().