EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessment of three models for estimating daily net radiation in southern Africa

L. Myeni, M.E. Moeletsi and A.D. Clulow

Agricultural Water Management, 2020, vol. 229, issue C

Abstract: Accurate quantification of net radiation flux (Rn) is of paramount importance for the estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) rate, which is used to estimate crop water use. A widely recommended Penman-Monteith procedure outlined in the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56 for estimation of Rn (FAO56- Rn) is often used to estimate Rn. However, the FAO56- Rn model is data-intensive and also requires site-specific calibrations of coefficients to attain a high level of accuracy of Rn estimates. These coefficients are often used without site-specific calibrations as a result of' the lack of large and representative radiative flux measurements in data-scarce regions such as southern Africa and Rn estimates are therefore considered questionable. Assessment of different models in-situ measurements of Rn is critical to identify an alternative approach that could be used for accurate estimation of Rn with minimal data input and without any site-specific calibrations in this region. In this study, two new Rn models, which differ only in the procedures used to compute atmospheric emissivity were proposed. The first model requires measurements of solar irradiance (Rs) maximum and minimum air temperatures (Tairmin and Tairmax) while the second model requires additional measurements of relative humidity (RHmin and RHmax) for estimation of the actual vapour pressure (eair). Two new Rn models and a widely recommended FAO56- Rn model were evaluated using daily Rn measurements acquired from five sites which represent different climatic and land cover conditions of southern Africa. The results showed that the first model performed better than all the evaluated models at four sites, with regression coefficient (r2) values greater than 0.90 and index of agreement (d) values greater than 0.97. These findings suggest that the first model presented here is the most promising and suitable to estimate Rn with minimum input data in southern Africa without any site-specific calibrations. The findings of this study can be used to inform the decision on selecting a model to be used for reliable estimates of Rn for improved estimation of crop water requirement in climatic conditions similar to this region.

Keywords: Calibration; Net radiometer; Modelling; Radiative flux; Reference crop evapotranspiration; Validations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419308078
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:229:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419308078

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105951

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:229:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419308078