Simulating the effects of conventional versus conservation tillage on soil water, nitrogen dynamics, and yield of winter wheat with RZWQM2

Jinli Ding, Wei Hu, Jicheng Wu, Yonghui Yang and Hao Feng

Agricultural Water Management, 2020, vol. 230, issue C

Abstract: The movement and distribution of the soil water and nitrogen are significantly influenced by tillage management. However, the dynamics of soil water and nitrogen due to changes in tillage and surface residue cover can be difficult to characterize due to limitations in field experimentation. The objective of this study was to quantify the differences in the soil water and nitrogen balance in the 0–100 cm soil profile, winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield, water productivity (WP) and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) that occur when conventional tillage (CT) was changed to four types of conservation tillage treatments (no-tillage [NT], subsoiling tillage [ST], no-tillage with straw [NS] and subsoiling tillage with straw [SS]). Experimental data from 2011 to 2016 collected in Henan province, China on a sandy loam soil was used to calibrate and validate the Root Zone Water Quality Model (RZWQM2). Then the model was used to simulate four tillage systems (NT, NS, ST, SS) that were then compared with CT. The agreement index (d) between simulated and measured soil water content, soil nitrate concentration, and grain yield ranged between 0.71 and 0.93. The root means square error (RMSE) of the soil water content and nitrate concentration was in the range 0.02–0.03 cm cm−1and 5.5–10.3 mg kg−1, respectively. When CT was converted to NT from 2011 to 2016, the model simulated a 9.1 % reduction in annual water loss and a 55.6 % decrease in nitrogen leaching loss and simulated significant increase in average grain yield, WP and NUE. Replacing CT with NT appears to be the best of the four alternative conservation tillage conversion strategies in Henan Province of China.

Keywords: Soil water and nitrogen balance; Tillage intensity; RZWQM2; Water productivity and nitrogen use efficiency (WP and NUE) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419315884
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:230:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419315884

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105956

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().