Effect of irrigation cut-off strategies on yield, water productivity and gas exchange in a drip-irrigated hazelnut (Corylus avellana L. cv. Tonda di Giffoni) orchard under semiarid conditions

Samuel Ortega-Farias, Emilio Villalobos-Soublett, Camilo Riveros-Burgos, Mauricio Zúñiga and Luis E. Ahumada-Orellana

Agricultural Water Management, 2020, vol. 238, issue C

Abstract: An experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of irrigation cut-off (ICO) strategies on yield components, water productivity (WP), and gas exchange in drip-irrigated hazelnut (Corylus avellana L., cv. Tonda di Giffoni) trees during two consecutive growing seasons. The experimental design was completely randomized, with four ICO treatments and four replicates per treatment based on threshold values of the midday stem water potential (Ψstem). In the T1 treatment, Ψstem was maintained around –0.7 MPa, while T2, T3, and T4 treatments did not receive irrigation from the beginning of stage III (fruit growth curve) until trees reached approximately the following Ψstem thresholds: –1.0 MPa in T2, –1.3 MPa in T3 and –1.6 MPa in T4. Once reached the specific thresholds, irrigation was restored and maintained according to T1 in all treatments until harvest. Besides, measurements of Ψstem, stomatal conductance (gs), net CO2 assimilation rate (An), transpiration rate (E), yield components, α-tocopherol kernel content, and WP were evaluated in this study. Results indicated that values of Ψstem, An,gs, and E observed in T3 and T4 were between 24–29, 15–37, 15–40, and 11–32 % lower than those found in T1, respectively. T4 significantly decreased yield (kg tree–1), kernel (KW), and fruit (FW) weights, but KW/FW ratio and the α-tocopherol kernel content (μg g–1) were not significantly different among treatments. Also, this study indicated that the T2, T3, and T4 treatments had 10, 17, and 25 days without irrigation, which produced water savings of 19, 24, and 29 % in comparison with T1, respectively. Finally, WP was significantly affected by ICO strategies, with the minimum and maximum values observed in T1 (0.51 kg m–3) and T4 (0.86 kg m–3), respectively.

Keywords: Regulated deficit irrigation; Plant-water relations; Water productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419308157
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:238:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419308157

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106173

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().