Effects of different film mulching methods on soil water productivity and maize yield in a semiarid area of China

Peng Zhang, Ting Wei, Qingfang Han, Xiaolong Ren and Zhikuan Jia

Agricultural Water Management, 2020, vol. 241, issue C

Abstract: Film mulching has been used widely to improve field productivity in rainfed agricultural ecosystems in semiarid areas of China. During 2013–2016, we evaluated the effects of different film mulching methods on soil water, water productivity, crop yield, and economic benefits in a semiarid area of southern Ningxia, China. Five treatments were tested: (i) a control method consisting of conventional flat planting without mulching (CK); (ii) alternate mulching and bare rows without ridges and planting in mulched rows (P); (iii) maize planted in furrows separated by consecutive plastic film-mulched ridges (S); (iv) maize planted in furrows separated by alternating large and small plastic film-mulched ridges (D); and (v) maize, planted in furrows with large plastic film-mulched ridges alternating with flat plastic film-mulched spaces (R). After four years of continuous treatment, the results indicated that D and S treatments significantly increased soil water content at depths of 0–200 cm during the early growth stage, but the increases in the soil water content were lower later in the maize growth process. The grain yield increases were affected by the different hydrothermal conditions in various years. On average, mulching increased grain yield by 31.33 %, and biomass accumulation by 22.48 %. Across four seasons, film mulching significantly (P < 0.05) increased water use efficiency and precipitation use efficiency, especially in D by 34.56 % and 43.09 %, and S by 35.25 % and 42.79 %, respectively. Mulching changed the crop water consumption characteristics, and resulted in higher crop water productivity due to an improved hydro-thermal balance, especially during the vegetative (30–90 days) and pre-reproductive (90–120 days) growth stages, which may account for yield increase effects in this system. In addition, the results suggested that the mulching system achieves higher economic returns than CK, especially the S treatment (7538 ¥ ha−1, representing an average of 29.19 % higher than CK.). The S treatment could serve as a promising adaptive management method for increasing maize productivity to cope with food security and climate change in this semi-arid area with limited and erratic precipitation.

Keywords: Dryland farming area; Economic benefits; Film mulching; Grain yield; Soil water use (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419313496
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:241:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419313496

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106382

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().