EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Effect of irrigation levels, planting methods and mulching on nutrient uptake, yield, quality, water and fertilizer productivity of field mustard (Brassica rapa L.) under sandy loam soil

Samar Pal Singh, B.S. Mahapatra, Biswajit Pramanick and Vimal Raj Yadav

Agricultural Water Management, 2021, vol. 244, issue C

Abstract: Adoption of suitable irrigation scheduling, planting technique and mulching can be very useful to improve the growth, yield and quality of field mustard crop which is mainly grown in winter season with residual moisture. A field experiment was carried out in winter seasons of 2014–15 and 2015–16 at crop research farm of Pantnagar, India to evaluate the effect of irrigation levels, planting methods and mulching on nutrient uptake, yield, quality, water and fertilizer productivity of field mustard [Brassica rapa (L.) var. trilocularis (Roxb.) Kitam] at sandy loam soil. Results revealed that irrigation at 1.2 irrigation water/ cumulative pan evaporation ratio (IW/CPE ratio) resulted in higher yield, N, P, K, and S uptake by plant, oil quality and fertilizer productivity and this irrigation level was at par with 0.9 IW/CPE ratio during 1st year of study when there was good amount of winter rainfall. Among different planting methods and mulching practices, raised bed planting and mulching with rice straw at 5000 kg ha−1 exhibited significantly higher yield, nutrient uptake, oil quality, water and fertilizer productivity of the crop than that of in flat bed planting and no-mulch. However, it was also recorded that water productivity was reduced by increasing the irrigation levels. From this study, it was evaluated that in a normal winter rainfall year field mustard could be irrigated at 0.9 IW/CPE ratio to achieve higher yield, quality and fertilizer productivity of the crop in sandy loam soil. While, irrigation should be given at 1.2 IW/CPE ratio if there is scarcity in winter rainfall.

Keywords: Irrigation scheduling; Raised bed planting, straw mulching; Yield; Quality; Field mustard (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420320862
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:244:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420320862

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106539

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:244:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420320862