Coffee performs better than amomum as a candidate in the rubber agroforestry system: Insights from water relations

Bin Yang, Xianjing Meng, Xiai Zhu, Sissou Zakari, Ashutosh K. Singh, Farkhanda Bibi, Nan Mei, Liang Song and Wenjie Liu

Agricultural Water Management, 2021, vol. 244, issue C

Abstract: Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantations have been facing a double challenge of land degradation and seasonal drought in Southeast Asia. Various cash crops are recently interplanted with rubber trees to face these issues. However, the water relations between rubber trees and the intercrops remain poorly understood. This study aims to evaluate the influences of three cash intercrops, namely two herbaceous plants (Amomum villosum and Alpinia oxyphylla) and a woody beverage (Coffea arabica), on rubber water utilization through both spatial and temporal scales. We investigated the plant water-absorption dynamics, root biomass, and intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEi) throughout a whole year (2017–2018). The results showed that rubber trees (43.5 ± 2.6%) and intercrops (69.1 ± 3.2%) highly depended on soil water from the 0–20 cm depths. An interspecific water competition occurred in all the rubber-based agroforestry practices, because of their similar water source and root distribution in the vertical soil profiles. Overall, the WUEi of rubber trees was relatively higher during the dry season (δ13C: −30.79 ± 1.12‰) compared to the rainy season (δ13C: −31.65 ± 0.99‰). Coffee (C. arabica) better facilitated the soil water availability than the other intercrops, suggesting its suitability as an intercrop for rubber trees. Alpinia-oxyphylla (A. oxyphylla) played a moderate role on soil water retention. Amomum (A. villosum), however, aggravated the soil water deficit in the agroforestry practice. Given the differences in water relations to rubber trees, the introduction of woody crops rather than herbaceous crops can improve the resistance of rubber plantation to the frequent drought stress in this region.

Keywords: Agroforestry system; Interspecific competition; Root biomass; Soil moisture; Water utilization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420321405
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:244:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420321405

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106593

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().