Effect of sulfur fertilizer on summer maize grain yield and soil water utilization under different irrigation patterns from anthesis to maturity

Yuzhao Ma, Hui Zhang, Yangfang Xue, Yingbo Gao, Xin Qian, Hongcui Dai, Kaichang Liu, Quanqi Li and Zongxin Li

Agricultural Water Management, 2021, vol. 250, issue C

Abstract: The enhanced yield of summer maize depends not only on soil water, but also on plant nutrition and fertilization with sulfur, a key element, which plays an important role in improving yield and water use. However, no research has focused on the coupling effects of sulfur application and irrigation patterns from anthesis to maturity on summer–maize grain yield and water use. We tested three irrigation patterns: no irrigation after anthesis (W0), irrigation at 15 days after anthesis (W1), and irrigation at 15 and 30 days after anthesis (W2), either combined with sulfur (S1, elemental sulfur) or without sulfur (S0) to evaluate the soil moisture content (SMC), grain yield, and water utilization of summer maize in a rainout shelter during the 2016 and 2017 growing seasons, in the North China Plain. Sulfur application reduced the SMC at 0–20 cm irrespective of irrigation pattern at harvest, but increased it at 30–120 cm while reducing evapotranspiration under W1 and W2. Compared to W0, W1 and W2 treatments significantly increased aboveground biomass (10.9% and 21.9% in 2016; 20.4% and 31.7% in 2017, respectively) and grain yield (16.1% and 26.2% in 2016; 24.6% and 35.3% in 2017, respectively). Water productivity at the grain yield level (WPy) increased with sulfur application by 6.4%, 8.8%, and 7.6% in 2016, and by 4.3%, 7.9%, and 6.4% in 2017 under W0, W1, and W2 conditions, respectively. The results indicated that sulfur application enhanced WPy, increased grain yield of summer maize. Thus, combining post-anthesis irrigation with sulfur application should be recommended for attaining high WPy and yield of summer maize in the North China Plain.

Keywords: Water productivity; Soil water content; Evapotranspiration; Aboveground biomass; North China Plain (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421000937
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:250:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421000937

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106828

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().