Effects of wheat row spacing layout and drip tape spacing on yield and water productivity in sandy clay loam soil in a semi-arid region

Ali Ghadami Firouzabadi, Javad Baghani, Mehdi Jovzi and Mohammad Albaji

Agricultural Water Management, 2021, vol. 251, issue C

Abstract: Recent droughts and subsequent reduction of water resources in arid and semi-arid regions have highlighted the necessity of altering surface irrigation techniques to modern methods of irrigation. The present study compares drip irrigation tubes with 60 and 75 cm spacing with the furrow irrigation prevalent in Hamedan province, Iran and investigates the effects of the former form of irrigation on the productivity of wheat crops with various cropping layouts. This experiment was implemented as a field-scale experiment in sandy clay loam texture soil and consisted of the following treatments: 4 cultivated rows with 15 cm spacing on both sides of the drip tape, and 75 cm spacing between tapes (T1); 4 cultivated rows with 20-cm row spacing, and 75 cm drip tape spacing (T2); 3 cultivated rows with 20 cm row spacing and 60-cm drip tape spacing (T3); 4 cultivated rows with 15 cm row spacing and 60 cm drip tape spacing (T4); 2 cultivated rows with 30 cm row spacing and 60 cm drip tape spacing (T5); and furrow irrigation which consisted of 4 cultivated rows with 12 cm spacing on the ridge and 60 cm furrow spacing (F). The results showed that the maximum and minimum value of the two-year average grain yield and irrigation water productivity were those of T1 and F treatments at 7443 and 5996 kg ha−1 and 1.91 and 1.02 kg m−3, respectively. The maximum and minimum values of two-year average weight of 1000 kernels were also obtained from T1 and F treatments at 44.3 and 42.1 g, respectively. The mean irrigation water productivity obtained for drip and furrow irrigation treatments were 1.74 and 1.01 kg m−3, respectively. Results indicated that drip irrigation caused a 33% reduction in applied irrigation water use and a 72% increase in irrigation water productivity in comparison to the furrow irrigation method.

Keywords: Applied irrigation water; Drip irrigation; Irrigation water productivity; Penman-Monteith; Water requirement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421001335
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:251:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421001335

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106868

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().