Water footprints of bioethanol cropping systems in Uruguay

Mauricio Bustamante-Silveira, Guillermo Siri-Prieto and Leonidas Carrasco-Letelier

Agricultural Water Management, 2021, vol. 252, issue C

Abstract: Bioenergy is the most widely used type of renewable energy. However, an assessment of water consumption and pollution is necessary to determine the water demand of this energy source. The Uruguayan public policy to decarbonize energy sources highlighted the use of bioenergy. In this regard, we analyzed the water footprint (WF) of four bioethanol cropping systems: (1) maize-wheat-sorghum rotation without harvested crop residues (MWS), (2) maize-wheat-sorghum rotation with harvested crop residues (MWS-R), (3) continuous sweet sorghum (Ss), and (4) switchgrass (Sw). In order to assess the WF of bioethanol production, green (WFgreen) and gray (WFgray) components of crop production were calculated by considering the different volumes of water involved in evaporation, rainfall, and fertilizer pollution. Annual cropping systems (i.e., MWS, MWS-R, Ss) had the largest WFs (23.1–30.9 m3Lethanol−1). Switchgrass had the lowest values per hectare and per liter of ethanol (12,735 m3(ha yr)−1 and 3.8 m3Lethanol−1, respectively). The volume required to assimilate phosphorous (P) and nitrogen (N) fertilizers played a significant role in bioethanol cropping systems. In annual systems, WFgray was the main fraction (87%) of total WF (WFT). Averaged across all cropping systems, WFgray related to P was 13 times larger than WFgray related to N.

Keywords: Bioenergy; Green water; Gray water; Soil erosion; Intensification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421001359
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:252:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421001359

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106870

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().