Modelling water consumption, N fates and maize yield under different water-saving management practices in China and Pakistan

Shah Jahan Leghari, Kelin Hu, Yichang Wei, Tongchao Wang, Tofique Ahmed Bhutto and Mahmooda Buriro

Agricultural Water Management, 2021, vol. 255, issue C

Abstract: Excessive water and fertilizer input in conventional farming practices not only lead to low production but also damaged the ecosystem by causing groundwater decline and groundwater nitrate contamination. The two-year field experiments were conducted at Zhengzhou of China and TandoJam of Pakistan sites, respectively. The WHCNS (soil-water-heat-carbon-nitrogen-simulator) model was used to simulate soil water dynamic, nitrogen (N) fate and maize yield under different irrigation practices, including farmer-based full flood irrigation (FI), drip irrigation (DI) and rainfed (RF) at the Zhengzhou site. Treatments of the TandoJam site were full flood irrigation (F100), moderate deficit irrigation (F75) and high deficit irrigation (F50) to meet the 100%, 75% and 50% crop evapotranspiration, respectively. Results showed that the model precisely simulated water consumption, fates of N, crop growth, and yield at both sites. In Zhengzhou site, we found the lowest grain yield in the RF system, whereas the DI increased average grain yield by 9.8%, decreased 62.5% water consumption compared to FI for the two years. Moreover, the DI had a negligible amount of drainage, runoff, and N leaching, which subsequently improved water use efficiency (WUE) up-to 24.5% and 9.1% fertilizer N use efficiency (FNUE). In TandoJam site, compared to F100, the F75 produced almost equal grain yield with 25.1% water-saving, reduced 42.5% drainage and 11.8% runoff, 57% N leaching, enhanced 4.1% WUE and 14.9% FNUE. Furthermore, results suggested that too deficit irrigation, for example, F50, could cause serious yield loss or complete crop failure, because the weather condition of the TandoJam site is very hot.

Keywords: Irrigation practices; Water use efficiency; Fertilizer N use efficiency; Different climate conditions; WHCNS model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421002985
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:255:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421002985

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107033

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().