EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Use of the stable oxygen isotope method to evaluate the difference in water consumption and utilization strategy between alfalfa and maize fields in an arid shallow groundwater area

Chenli Hou, Delong Tian, Bing Xu, Jie Ren, Lei Hao, Ning Chen and Xianyue Li

Agricultural Water Management, 2021, vol. 256, issue C

Abstract: Returning farmland to grasslands (RFG)to restore soil fertility and prevent land degradation in overused agricultural lands is an important measure. However, the hydrological processes, water consumption and utilization in field systems are undoubtedly changed in shallow groundwater areas owing to RFG. Experiments in the Hetao irrigation district, Inner Mongolia, China, during 2017 (2-yr for alfalfa) and 2018 (3-yr for alfalfa) were conducted to evaluate the difference in soil water distribution, percolation, groundwater recharge, water consumption and water productivity between alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and maize (Zea mays L.) fields. The stable oxygen isotope method was used to reveal a strategy to utilize different water sources for alfalfa and maize in an arid shallow groundwater area. Compared with maize, the increase in water consumption by alfalfa increased the soil water consumption of the 0–100 cm soil layer and the groundwater recharge, which led to an increase of 9.44 mm and 65.32 mm, respectively. However, the leakage below 100 cm layer decreased by 44.91% compared with those of the maize field. The yield and WPc of alfalfa were 29.27% and 6.28% greater than that of maize in 2018, respectively. Percentages of 75.43%, 18.73% and 5.84% of irrigation water, groundwater and precipitation were taken up by alfalfa during the irrigation period, respectively, while it was 81.27%, 12.90% and 5.83% in the maize field, respectively. After irrigation, the crops primarily absorbed water from upper soil layer (0–40 cm), comprising 72.93% (alfalfa) and 69.8% (maize). However, more water from the deeper layers was used by alfalfa before irrigation, and the average contribution of 40–100 cm soil layer was 63.0%, an increase of 11.2% compared with maize. In addition, even though maize absorbed water by roots that could reach a soil depth of 80 cm, it primarily drew water from the 40–60 cm soil layer.

Keywords: Water consumption; Water use efficiency; Stable oxygen isotope; Alfalfa; Maize; Shallow groundwater area (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421003309
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:256:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421003309

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107065

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:256:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421003309