Satellite rainfall bias assessment for crop growth simulation – A case study of maize growth in Kenya
Calisto Kennedy Omondi,
Tom H.M. Rientjes,
Martijn J. Booij and
Andrew D. Nelson
Agricultural Water Management, 2021, vol. 258, issue C
Abstract:
In this research, the performance of satellite rainfall estimates (SREs) for crop growth simulation was investigated. Rainfall products selected were CHIRPS 2.0, CMORPH 1.0, MSWEP 2.2, and RFE 2.0. In-situ rainfall from 20 stations within the Lake Victoria basin in Kenya served as reference. Rainfall products were evaluated for onset days, rainfall depths, dry spells, and rainfall occurrence for four crop growth stages. Assessment was on a daily time step for the period 2012–2018 and on a point-to-pixel basis. Results showed that SREs exhibit large variation in timing of rainfall arrival. SREs exhibited largest interannual and spatial spreads in representing dry spell length during the flowering stage with CMORPH and CHIRPS showing best and weakest results, respectively. Bias of SREs in representing dry spells was smaller during early growth stages. Detecting rainfall occurrence by the SREs weakened as the growing season progressed. MSWEP, followed by RFE2, produced the best results in detecting rainfall events, while falsely detected rainfall was frequent in CHIRPS, particularly in later growth stages. SREs generally performed better during a wet than a dry growing season. SREs indicated less bias in rainfall depths during the early stages of crop growth but deteriorated at later stages. MSWEP and CMORPH exhibited the least and highest interannual spread in relative bias, respectively. In associating biases to severe and extreme water stress, based on crop water requirement satisfaction index, effects were more prevailing in the ripening than flowering stages. Findings of this study suggest that SREs can serve as input to crop growth modelling, but validation of SREs with rain gauge observed counterparts is essential.
Keywords: Bias; Crop growth simulation; Crop growth stages; Lake Victoria basin; Remote sensing; Satellite-based rainfall (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421004819
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:258:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421004819
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107204
Access Statistics for this article
Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns
More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().