Efficiency and feasibility of Best Management Practices to reduce nutrient loads in an agricultural river basin

Giovanni Francesco Ricci, D’Ambrosio, Ersilia, Anna Maria De Girolamo and Francesco Gentile

Agricultural Water Management, 2022, vol. 259, issue C

Abstract: Excessive use of mineral fertilizers and inappropriate tillage operations are two main drivers of land degradation. The European Green Deal (EUGD) aims to restore the natural functions of ground and surface soil by 2030. EU Member States will be called upon to include mitigation measures in their own management programs. In this context, the current work aimed to evaluate the feasibility of Best Management Practices (BMPs), generally used to counteract soil erosion, in achieving nutrient load reduction, and evaluate their economic convenience in the private and public sector. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was used to model point and diffuse nutrient sources in the Carapelle basin (Apulia, Italy) and to simulate BMP scenarios. Contour farming (CF), no tillage (NT), reforestation (RF), and two additional scenarios, including the 20% reduction of fertilizers in CF and NT, (CFR) and (NTR), were simulated following the EUGD strategy. For the current land uses, the riverine export of nitrogen (TN) and phosphorous (TP) were ∼49 kg ha-1y-1 and ∼0.044 kg ha-1y-1, respectively. CF and NT increased N-NO3 load both into surface runoff and in terms of leaching. Conversely, RF showed a reduction of N-NO3 losses. CFR and NTR scenarios decreased N-NO3 load both in surface runoff and leached of ∼20%. CFR and NTR represented the best alternative among the analyzed scenarios both for their lower production costs at the farm level and for their savings in terms of nutrient and soil losses. RF was economically profitable in sloped areas, thus representing BMPs that may be implemented in combination with other practices to have a greater impact at the basin scale. BMP implementation requires significant investments (public and private). The results of this study provide the scientific basis for decision-making for agriculture and watershed management.

Keywords: Best Management Practices (BMPs); Economic feasibility; Common Agricultural Policy; Rural Development Program; SWAT model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421005187
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:259:y:2022:i:c:s0378377421005187

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107241

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().