Drought tolerance assessment of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes at different growth stages, based on morphological and physiological traits

Sizwe Goodman Mthembu, Lembe Samukelo Magwaza, Jacob Mashilo, Asanda Mditshwa and Alfred Odindo

Agricultural Water Management, 2022, vol. 261, issue C

Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine drought tolerance of diverse potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes. The physiological and morphological responses of eight potato genotypes were assessed under well-irrigated (Wi) and deficit irrigation (Di) conditions across four different growth stages, namely, the Vegetative (VG), Tuber Initiation (TI), Tuber Bulking (TB) and maturity (MAT) stages, using an 8 × 4 × 2 factorial treatment structure with three replications. Data were collected on morphological traits such as Plant Height (PH), the Number of Leaves (NL), Tuber Yield (TY) and Total Above-Ground biomass (TAG), as well as the physiological traits such as stomatal conductance (gs), Transpiration rate (Tr), the rate of photosynthesis (A), Water Productivity (WP), Chlorophyll Content Index (CCI) and Relative Water Content (RWC). A significant (p < 0.05) genotype x water condition x growth stage effects were observed for A, Tr, WP, RWC, CCI, PH, NL, TY and TAG, which indicated the varied responses of the genotypes to the water conditions across the growth stages. This is useful when recommending the growth-stage specific and drought tolerant potato genotypes for production. Correlation analysis revealed significant and negative association between gs and WP with TY (r = −0.81; r = −0.77) at the VG stage, positive association between PH, Tr, A and WP with TY (r = 0.92; r = 0.65; r = 0.95; r = 0.88) at the TI stage.CCI positively correlated with TY (r = 0.71) at the MAT stage, and a negative association was observed between TAG with TY (r = −0.85) at the MAT stage, under Di conditions. Principal component bi-plot identified that the all-rounder genotypes that are resistant to drought in all stages include the Challenger, Sifra and Tyson. These genotypes are recommended for cultivation in water-restricted environments.

Keywords: Abiotic stress; Deficit irrigation; Leaf gaseous exchange; Photosynthesis; Water productivity; Yield (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421006387
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:261:y:2022:i:c:s0378377421006387

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107361

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().