Assessing the costs of Managed Aquifer Recharge options to support agricultural development

Joanne Vanderzalm, Declan Page, Peter Dillon, Dennis Gonzalez and Cuan Petheram

Agricultural Water Management, 2022, vol. 263, issue C

Abstract: Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) can play an important role in agricultural water management and productivity where suitable aquifers exist. Yet while the benefits and costs of surface water storage have been extensively reported, the benefits and costs of MAR have been under reported and poorly conceptualised to date. In this study of ten potential MAR schemes in wet-dry tropical climates of northern Australia the estimated levelized costs ranged from US$0.04 to $0.36/m3 for MAR schemes of 0.6–5 Mm3/y capacity. The type of MAR scheme had the largest influence on cost, resulting in the following order of increasing cost for 1 Mm3/y schemes: recharge release, infiltration basin, recharge weir, aquifer storage transfer and recovery (ASTR), aquifer storage and recovery (ASR), seawater intrusion barrier. Infiltration type schemes were typically lower cost than well-injection. Scheme scale, end use and experience with similar schemes were also key influences on cost. A five-fold increase in scale reduced the levelized cost of ASR by 60%. Conceptualisation allows comparison across dissimilar schemes and revealed significant costs (20–100% of operating) associated with approvals and monitoring required for risk-based scheme development and operation. MAR can facilitate conjunctive use of surface and groundwater for improved agricultural water management. Dams typically provide considerably larger storages which results in lower levelized costs, with estimates of $0.03 to $0.18/m3 for options (annual yield 55–1248 Mm3) in the same study area. MAR is more favoured in areas of low relief, offers the benefit of reducing evaporative losses and is well suited to mosaic irrigation with incremental development and relatively low capital expenditure which may be attractive for agricultural irrigation.

Keywords: Managed Aquifer Recharge; Water banking; Levelized cost; Capital cost; Operating cost; Northern Australia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421007149
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:263:y:2022:i:c:s0378377421007149

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107437

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().