Raised and sunken bed system for crop diversification, improving water productivity and economic returns: A case study in low-lying paddy lands of North-east India

Bhabesh Gogoi, Ajit Baishya, Monisha Borah, Jyoti Rekha Hazarika, Jahnabi Jyoti Kalita, Karuna Kanta Sharma and Ashok Bhattacharyya

Agricultural Water Management, 2022, vol. 264, issue C

Abstract: The raised and sunken bed (RSB) land configuration was tested and evaluated during 2017–2020 for promoting crop diversification and intensification, enhancing water and crop productivity, and testing the economic variability of the farmers of North-east India. Being situated in sub-tropics, the study area received an average annual rainfall of 1905 mm. Water accumulated in the sunken beds was used for irrigating crops in the raised beds. The results indicated considerable improvement in cropping intensity, productivity, employment, and income under RSB system in comparison to farmers’ practice (FP) of rice monocropping system. Various cropping sequences such as broccoli-blackgram, cabbage-blackgram, cauliflower-blackgram, tomato-cowpea (fodder), chilli-greengram, potato-blackgram, pea-greengram etc. in raised beds and rice-rice sequence in sunken beds were possible under RSB land configuration to diversify the rice monocropping system. The rice equivalent yield (REY) of the cropping sequences under RSB ranged between 8.9 and 43.5 t ha−1 over only 2.7 t ha−1 under FP. The employment generation and crop production were enhanced by over 10 times (942%) and 4 times (336%), respectively under RSB over the FP. Similarly, water productivity and production efficiency were enhanced by 2.0–31.0 and 1.5–13.8 times, respectively through various cropping sequences compared to rice monocropping (FP). The various cropping sequences under RSB land configuration enhanced the B:C ratio by 75.5–513.2% over the FP producing a net income ranging from USD 657.7 to USD 5890.1 ha−1 against only USD 26.1 ha−1 under FP.

Keywords: Raised and sunken beds; Low land; Crop diversification; Cropping system; Water productivity; Production efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422000439
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:264:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422000439

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107496

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().