Combined use of crop yield statistics and remotely sensed products for enhanced simulations of evapotranspiration within an agricultural watershed

Sangchul Lee, Junyu Qi, Gregory W. McCarty, Martha Anderson, Yun Yang, Xuesong Zhang, Glenn E. Moglen, Dooahn Kwak, Hyunglok Kim, Venkataraman Lakshmi and Seongyun Kim

Agricultural Water Management, 2022, vol. 264, issue C

Abstract: Water cycling within agricultural watersheds includes high uncertainty because of natural and anthropogenic factors (e.g., cultivation practices). Remotely sensed evapotranspiration products (RS-ET) have been adopted as an additional constraint on watershed modeling to enhance the accuracy of water cycling predictions while reducing uncertainty. However, plant parameters affecting evapotranspiration (ET) in watershed models are poorly calibrated without the use of appropriate constraints. The goal of this study is to assess the predictive uncertainty of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), depending on the inclusion or exclusion of annual crop yield as an additional constraint for an agricultural watershed. We analyzed the simulated results with acceptable performance measures depending on a varying degree of model constraints: one constraint (streamflow), two constraints (streamflow and RS-ET) and three constraints (streamflow, RS-ET, and crop yield). The three performance measures used were Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Percent bias (P-bias), and Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE). As the number of model’s constraints increased, the number of acceptable parameter sets were substantially reduced from 180 (acceptable for streamflow) to 116 (acceptable for streamflow and RS-ET) and 2 (acceptable for streamflow, RS-ET, and crop yield). In addition, overall model performance measures for ET were greatest in the simulation results with three constraints representing 0.02–0.2 and 0.04–0.05 greater NSE and KGE values than those of one constraint and two constraints, respectively. The parameter set with the best ET performance measures was also acceptable for predicting crop yield. Based on these results, we conclude that this crop yield data can be adopted as a model constraint for agricultural watersheds to reduce model uncertainty in ET simulations and to increase model prediction accuracy.

Keywords: Remotely sensed evapotranspiration; Additional constraint; Watershed modeling; Predictive uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422000506
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:264:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422000506

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107503

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().