Estimation of soil moisture content under high maize canopy coverage from UAV multimodal data and machine learning

Minghan Cheng, Xiyun Jiao, Yadong Liu, Mingchao Shao, Xun Yu, Yi Bai, Zixu Wang, Siyu Wang, Nuremanguli Tuohuti, Shuaibing Liu, Lei Shi, Dameng Yin, Xiao Huang, Chenwei Nie and Xiuliang Jin

Agricultural Water Management, 2022, vol. 264, issue C

Abstract: An accurate in-field estimate of soil moisture content (SMC) is critical for precision irrigation management. Current ground methods to measure SMC were limited by the disadvantages of small-scale monitoring and high cost. The development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) platforms now provides a cost-effective means for measuring SMC on a large scale. However, previous studies have considered only single-sensor estimates of SMC, so the combination of multiple sensors has yet to be thoroughly discussed. Additionally, the way in which soil depth, canopy coverage, and crop cultivars affect the SMC-estimation accuracy remains unclear. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the SMC-estimation accuracy provided by multimodal data fusion and four machine learning algorithms: partial least squares regression, K nearest neighbor, random forest regression (RFR), and backpropagation neural network (BPNN); (2) discuss the accuracy of the remote-sensing approach for estimating SMC at different soil depths, and (3) explore how canopy coverage and crop cultivars affect the accuracy of SMC estimation. The following results were obtained: (1) Data from multispectral sensors provided the most accurate SMC estimates regardless of which of the four machine learning algorithms was used. (2) Multimodal data fusion improved the SMC estimation accuracy, especially when combining multispectral and thermal data. (3) The RFR algorithm provided more accurate SMC estimates than the other three algorithms, with the highest accuracy obtained by combining data from RGB, multispectral, and thermal sensors with an R2 = 0.78 (0.78) and a relative root-mean-square error of 11.2% (9.6%) for 10-cm-deep (20-cm-deep) soil. (4) UAV-based SMC-estimation methods provided similar, stable performance for SMC estimates at various depths and even yielded smaller relative error for deeper estimates (20 cm). (5) The RFR and BPNN machine learning algorithms both provided relatively accurate SMC estimates for modest canopy coverage (0.2–0.4) but relatively poor estimates for higher (>0.4) or lower (<0.2) canopy coverage. (6) The SMC-estimation accuracy for different maize cultivars (JNK728 and ZD958) did not differ significantly (P < 0.01). These results indicate that UAV-based multimodal data fusion combined with machine learning algorithms can provide relatively accurate and repeatable SMC estimates. This approach can thus be used to monitor SMC and design precision irrigation systems.

Keywords: Remote sensing; Soil moisture; Multimodality; Data fusion; UAV-based (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422000774
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:264:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422000774

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107530

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().