Plastic film mulching affects field water balance components, grain yield, and water productivity of rainfed maize in the Loess Plateau, China: A synthetic analysis of multi-site observations

Naijiang Wang, Haixin Chen, Dianyuan Ding, Tibin Zhang, Cheng Li, Xiaoqi Luo, Xiaosheng Chu, Hao Feng, Yongsheng Wei and Kadambot H.M. Siddique

Agricultural Water Management, 2022, vol. 266, issue C

Abstract: Plastic film mulching (PM) has been widely practiced for rainfed maize (Zea mays L.) in the Loess Plateau, China. However, controversy remains regarding its impacts on field water balance components. There is also scant quantitative information on water-limited potential grain yield (GYw) and water productivity (WPw). A meta-analysis and boundary line analysis were conducted using 1421 paired observations extracted from 83 peer-reviewed publications to (1) assess PM-induced changes in soil water storage at planting (SWSP), evapotranspiration (ET), and soil water storage at harvest (SWSH), and (2) quantify GYw and WPw in PM fields. PM significantly increased SWSP by 4.0% on average due to an 83.2% average increase in precipitation storage during the fallow season. Overall, ET showed a significant positive response to PM (+2.9%), resulting in 56.4% more soil water depletion than no-mulching (NM) fields over the growing season. However, SWSH significantly increased by an average 1.8% after applying PM, indicating that increased storage of fallow season precipitation replenished increased depletion of growing season soil water. Averaged across all samples, PM had significant positive effects on GY (+56.1%) and WP (+47.5%), which were attributed to higher transpiration, ratio of transpiration to ET, and harvest index from the perspective of effective crop water use. Based on GY and WP boundary lines, GYw and WPw under NM were estimated to be 10,728 kg ha-1 and 26.8 kg ha-1 mm-1 on average, respectively, and the respective averages under PM were 13,702 kg ha-1 and 34.8 kg ha-1 mm-1. The GY and WP gaps (i.e., differences between actual and potential values) averaged around 3300 kg ha-1 and 7.0 kg ha-1 mm-1, respectively, in NM and PM fields. In the GY versus ET and WP versus ET scatter plots, the vertical distances between the measured data points on a specific field and the corresponding boundary line indicated field-specific gaps for GY and WP. This study increases our understanding of the effect sizes of PM on field water balance components and the benchmarks of GY and WP for rainfed maize in the Chinese Loess Plateau and other regions with similar conditions worldwide.

Keywords: Rainfed maize; Plastic film mulching; Meta-analysis; Boundary line analysis; Field water balance components; Grain yield; Water productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422001172
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:266:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422001172

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107570

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().