EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessment of peach trees water status and leaf gas exchange using on-the-ground versus airborne-based thermal imagery

J.M. Ramírez-Cuesta, M.F. Ortuño, V. Gonzalez-Dugo, P.J. Zarco-Tejada, M. Parra, J.S. Rubio-Asensio and D.S. Intrigliolo

Agricultural Water Management, 2022, vol. 267, issue C

Abstract: The thermal region of the electromagnetic spectrum might provide valuable information for assessing plant water status. Nevertheless, the plant’s physiology and the scale of measurement, (e.g. sensor viewing geometry and the canopy aggregation) are critical for quantifiying and monitoring water stress. This study compares the Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) of a peach orchard obtained using on-the-ground, and airborne-based canopy temperature (Tc). The temporal evolution of CWSI under mild water stress conditions was assessed for three different irrigation strategies (over-irrigation, OI; farmer irrigation, FI; and non-irrigation, NI). Two aerial campaigns per irrigation season (2017–2018) were performed with an airborne thermal sensor: a first flight under well-watered conditions, and a second flight once mild water stress was developed. At the time of the flights, Tc and net photosynthesis (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs) and stem water potential (Ψs) were measured on the ground with a hand-held thermal camera, a portable gas exchange system and a pressure chamber, respectively. The canopy temperature obtained from the hand-held thermal camera, averaging the sunlit and shaded parts of the canopy, agreed with that derived from the airborne measurements (Y=1.00X; RMSE= 1.97 K). The CWSI values calculated from both approaches detected peach water status under different irrigation strategies. In general, Ψs was better predicted from the aircraft (R² up to 0.72 for CWSI obtained from the aircraft versus R2 =0.51 for Tc ground measurements), whereas the use of ground measurements was preferred for estimating gs and Pn (R² up to 0.73 and 0.74 for Tc ground measurements versus R2 =45 and 0.56 for Tc and CWSI derived from the aircraft). Regardless the approach used for deriving Tc, and due to the consideration of different meteorological conditions (i.e different dates), CWSI provided a better relationship with Ψs than Tc, whereas the latter was more closely related with gs and Pn.

Keywords: Physiological parameters; Remote sensing; Thermography; Canopy temperature (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422001755
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:267:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422001755

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107628

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:267:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422001755