Grain yield, actual evapotranspiration and water productivity responses of maize crop to deficit irrigation: A global meta-analysis

M. Gloriose B. Allakonon, Sissou Zakari, Pierre G. Tovihoudji, A. Sènami Fatondji and P.B. Irénikatché Akponikpè

Agricultural Water Management, 2022, vol. 270, issue C

Abstract: Deficit irrigation (DI) has been implemented in arid regions to improve water productivity while maintaining or increasing crop yield. In this study, we carried out a global scale meta-analysis to (1) quantify the response ratios of grain yield (GY), actual crop evapotranspiration (ETc act) and water productivity (WP) under DI stress. Then, we (2) examined the effects of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) fertilizer rates, climate, soil texture, DI application mode, and maize growing cycle on GY, ETc act and WP. A total of 1192 observations retrieved from 167 studies were used to estimate the effect size and generate forest plots for each factor at three different growth stages. The response ratio (RR) of maize GY was higher for short-cycle varieties (RR, −0.14), in semi-arid climates (RR, −0.25) and under irrigation amount reduction (RR, −0.21). Maize ETc act was higher for long and medium cycle varieties (RR, −0.22), for medium-textured soils (RR, −0.14) and drier climates. The WP improved by 9% on heavy soils compared to both light and medium soils, indicating that heavy soils are more suitable for growing maize under DI. This study highlights that high DI stress was often applied with low nitrogen rates to limit reciprocal effect on yield loss. The application of DI stress before the reproductive stage induced an adaptation strategy that limits maize yield loss and improves WP. Thus, the application of DI stress should start earlier at the vegetative stage to be more beneficial to maize. Furthermore, DI stress should target early-maturing maize varieties to achieve higher crop WP. The findings imply that DI stress could be a promising strategy for water management in maize cropping systems while considering appropriate soil, growing stages, varieties and climate.

Keywords: Corn grain yield; Response ratio; Water-saving practice; Actual evapotranspiration; Water productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422002931
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:270:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422002931

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107746

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().