Knitted-sock geotextile envelopes increase drain inflow in subsurface drainage systems

Ehsan Ghane, Babak Dialameh, Yousef AbdalAal and Mohammad Ghane

Agricultural Water Management, 2022, vol. 274, issue C

Abstract: A knitted-sock geotextile envelope is commonly used in the USA, Canada, and parts of Europe to prevent sediment entry into agricultural subsurface drain pipes. Sand-slot pipes have a narrow width to prevent sediment from moving into the drain pipe, and they are used in the USA and Canada as a cheaper alternative to knitted-sock-wrapped pipes. The type of drain pipe (sand-slot or sock-wrapped) is important in subsurface drainage design because it affects the entrance head loss caused by the convergence of flowlines toward the drain perforations, thereby influencing the effective radius of the pipe, which in turn affects drain inflow. Although the theoretical effective radius of a knitted-sock-wrapped pipe can be estimated based on analytical equations, no study has experimentally measured it to verify the theoretical equations. This study had two objectives: (1) Experimentally measure the effective radius of sock-wrapped and sand-slot pipes to verify the theoretical method, and (2) comparatively evaluate the drain inflow performance of a sock-wrapped pipe and a sand-slot pipe. We tested the pipe materials in a sand-tank experiment equipped with manometers. The results showed that the measured and theoretical effective radii were 5.5 and 5.6 cm for the sock-wrapped pipe, 0.7 and 0.7 cm for the 4-row sand-slot pipe, and 1.6 and 1.6 cm for the 8-row sand-slot pipe, respectively. This agreement confirmed that the theoretical method reliably estimated the effective radius of the pipes. The sock-wrapped pipe had a considerably lower entrance head loss (0.4 cm) than the 8-row (6.1 cm) and 4-row (10.4 cm) sand-slot pipes, thereby increasing the effective radius of the sock-wrapped pipe. The estimated drain inflow of the sock-wrapped pipe was 12% and 20% higher than that of the 8-row and 4-row sand-slot pipes, respectively. In conclusion, we verified that the theoretical method accurately estimated the effective radius of the pipes and demonstrated that the sock-wrapped pipe had considerably higher drain inflow than the sand-slot pipe.

Keywords: Agricultural drainage; Drain envelope; Effective radius; Entrance resistance; Perforation; Sand-slot pipe (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377422004863
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:274:y:2022:i:c:s0378377422004863

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107939

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().