A multi-pollutant pilot study to evaluate the grey water footprint of irrigated paddy rice

Maziyar Vaez Roudbari, Ali Dehnavi, Shervin Jamshidi and Mohamadreza Yazdani

Agricultural Water Management, 2023, vol. 282, issue C

Abstract: Grey water footprint (GWF) is one component of water footprint (WF). It considers multiple pollutants and water quality regulations when determining the amount of freshwater required to assimilate the pollution load discharged by agricultural production into the receiving water body. This indicator is typically estimated for accounting the WF of agricultural productions including paddy rice. This study evaluates the GWF of irrigated paddy rice (IPR) through sampling multiple pollutants in both the inflow and drainage of a pilot area, simultaneously. It aims to find a realistic range for the GWF of IPR and emphasize the impacts of pollutants, regulations (Cmax), and inflow (Qin) variations. For this purpose, an isolated subsurface drained farm in northern Iran was chosen as a pilot area where 32 samples from inflow and outflow were taken during the cultivation period (94 days). Here, the concentrations of electro-conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), chemical oxidation demand (COD), nitrate (NO3), total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), total phosphorous (TP), total nitrogen (TN), and butachlor herbicide, as well as irrigation and drainage volume were investigated. Cmax was examined through three regulation scenarios: strict (S1), normal (S2), and lenient (S3). In addition, Qin was measured by the methods of water balance and SCD-USDA. Results show that TP was most critical in paddy rice GWF (S1-S2), while DO can be an alternative critical parameter in S3. Based on calculations, GWF was ultimately varied between 1109 and 8079 m3/ton in all scenarios. It incorporated a significant share in WF as its ratio varied between 46% and 86%. Cmax showed relatively higher impacts on GWF comparing with the precise calculation of Qin. Moreover, calculating the net pollution loads of multiple pollutants discharged from paddy field was recommended for higher accuracy. As a result, a range for GWF is introduced instead of an absolute value that can be updated by further case studies.

Keywords: Irrigated agriculture; Paddy rice; Multiple pollutants; Water footprint; Water quality management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423001567
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:282:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423001567

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108291

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().