Further investigating the performance of crop water stress index for maize from baseline fluctuation, effects of environmental factors, and variation of critical value

Liyuan Zhang, Huihui Zhang, Qingzhen Zhu and Yaxiao Niu

Agricultural Water Management, 2023, vol. 285, issue C

Abstract: To further analyze the accuracy and applicability of empirical (CWSI_E) and theoretical (CWSI_T) crop water stress index calculation methods, study was conducted at the USDA-ARS Limited Irrigation Research Farm (LIRF), Colorado, USA during two maize growing seasons in 2013 and 2015. The growth stage and seasonal changes of non-water-stressed baseline (NWSB) and non-transpiration baseline (NTB), the effects of environmental factors, and the estimation performances of water stress, grain yield, and WUE were analyzed. Results show that significant correlations (p < 0.001) with vapor pressure deficit (VPD) were found for two baselines, however, the distributions with the changes of VPD and growth stage and seasonal changes of NWSB and NTB were different between two methods. Specifically, neither growth stage nor growing season significantly affects the baselines of CWSI_E, indicating that the baselines of the empirical method were more stable than those of the theoretical method. The lower baselines and smaller difference between NWSB and NTB were more likely to be observed in the theoretical method than the empirical method. The greater CWSI values were observed for the theoretical method because of the relatively smaller difference between NWSB and NTB. VPD with values greater than 1.5 kPa may a suitable environmental criterion to be used to indicate the applicability of the two CWSI methods for crop water stress estimation. Both methods could track maize water stress with R2 of 0.55 for CWSI_E and 0.49 for CWSI_T (n = 236) with sap flow measurements and could estimate grain yield with the highest R2 of 0.95 and WUE with the highest R2 of 0.87 (n = 24). However, greater values and a clear downtrend for three one-hour periods were observed for CWSI_T because of the relatively smaller difference between NWSB_T and NTB_T. This study contributes to the knowledge in the area of stable and accurate monitoring of crop water status based on CWSI.

Keywords: Empirical and theoretical CWSI; Non-water-stressed baseline; Sap flow; Grain yield; Water use efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423002147
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:285:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423002147

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108349

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().