EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Stomatal conductance modulates maize yield through water use and yield components under salinity stress

Qi Liao, Risheng Ding, Taisheng Du, Shaozhong Kang, Ling Tong, Shujie Gu, Shaoyu Gao and Jia Gao

Agricultural Water Management, 2024, vol. 294, issue C

Abstract: Drought or/and salinity stress significantly impact maize water use and production. However, comprehensive investigations into the genotype × environment interactions (water or/and salinity) on maize growth, water use, and water productivity (WP) and the physiological controlling factors governing maize production remain lacking. In the present study, we rigorously investigated the effect of water or/and salinity on leaf physiological and morphological characteristics, evapotranspiration (ET), yield and its components (kernel number, KN; thousand kernel weight, TKW) for two genotypes (XY335 and ZD958) over two years, and revealed the mechanisms of yield response to these traits. We found that stomatal conductance (gs) and net photosynthesis rate (A), aboveground biomass (AGB), ET, and KN were higher in XY335 compared to those in ZD958 in both years. Water and salinity stress reduced gs, A, leaf area (LA), the fraction of canopy radiation interception (fPAR), AGB, ET, yield, and KN, while increasing intrinsic water use efficiency. Simultaneous water and salinity stress exhibited an antagonistic effect on WP. Yield was modulated by both ET and yield components. ET was mainly regulated by LA, and only KN was driven by A under salt-free condition. However, under salinity stress, ET was jointly regulated by gs and fPAR, and both gs and A affected KN and TKW. Importantly, a decrease in ET induced by stress did not always lead to yield reduction, provided the reduction remained below about 20% of the maximum value. Thus, mildly regulated deficit irrigation or adapting to low-concentration soil salinity stress was preferable for sustaining yield and improving WP. Nevertheless, a combination of both approaches diminished the water-saving benefits of individual farmland management practices. This study filled the knowledge gap regarding the physiological mechanisms of driving yield variations and offered valuable insights for effective crop water management in drought and soil-salinized regions.

Keywords: Drought and salinity stress; Interactive effect; Maize yield; Stomatal conductance; Water productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424000520
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:294:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424000520

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108717

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:294:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424000520