Performances of different yield-detrending methods in assessing the impacts of agricultural drought and flooding: A case study in the middle-and-lower reach of the Yangtze River, China

Huayue Meng and Long Qian

Agricultural Water Management, 2024, vol. 296, issue C

Abstract: In evaluating the impacts of drought and flooding disasters on crop yields, accurately calculating meteorological yield (i.e., detrended yield) is an important procedure. The present work aimed to compare various yield-detrending methods in terms of characterizing the regression relationships between meteorological yield and the intensities of drought and flooding. Taking the middle-and-lower reach of the Yangtze River (MLRYR) as the study region, the intensities of drought and flooding during the growing seasons of four study crops (cotton, oilseed rape, wheat, and maize) were quantified using the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. Nine popular yield-detrending methods and the first-difference method were employed to determine meteorological yields. The results indicated that the examined methods consistently identified the cases with very significant yield-reducing impacts of drought and flooding. The first-difference method identified 58 significant regression relationships, outperforming the yield-detrending methods (identifying 39–44 significant regression relationships). The 20-yr moving average and the linear fitting methods performed best at the provincial level, while the cubic smoothing spline and the quadratic polynomial fitting methods performed best at the district level. Based on these best-performing methods, the average method was proposed and exhibited wider applicability and better performance than the individual methods. In terms of meteorological yield losses, cotton was the most affected crop (35% of all districts experienced severe cotton yield loss) and Anhui was the most affected region (with an average crop yield loss of 14.06%). The yield-reducing impact of flooding was significant in 41 districts; in comparison, the impact of drought was significant only in 7 districts. Additionally, oilseed rape was the crop most affected by drought and flooding. These results can provide guidance for assessing agricultural drought and flooding disasters under climate change.

Keywords: Yield loss; Climate change; Disaster risk reduction; SPEI; Crop water relation; Food security (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424001471
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:296:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424001471

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108812

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().