Yield response and water productivity of soybean (Glycine max L.) to deficit irrigation and sowing time in south-eastern Australia

Ketema Zeleke and Claas Nendel

Agricultural Water Management, 2024, vol. 296, issue C

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate irrigation strategies and sowing dates that would maximise soybean yield and water productivity. It is based on field experiments conducted during two seasons and simulation modelling. Irrigation treatments were 33%, 66%, 66% plus 100% during pod development and pod-fill stages, and 100% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc). In the first season experiment, cvs. Bidgee and Snowy were sown on 15 Nov. In the second season, cv. Bidgee was sown on 15 Nov and 15 Dec. Five sowing dates (1, 15, 30 Nov and 15, 31 Dec) and eight irrigation scenarios were analysed in-silico using the crop model APSIM. For the simulations, the first four irrigation scenarios were set by applying 50%ETc during one of the four growth stages: vegetative stage, flowering stage, pod development and pod-filling stage, and maturity stage. The other five irrigation treatments were 0%ETc, 25%ETc, 50%ETc, 75%ETc, and 100%ETc throughout the growing season. Soil water content and above-ground dry matter were measured at regular time intervals. Seed yield, 100-seed weight, oil and protein contents were determined at harvest. Water deficit during pod development and pod-filling stage had significant effect on seed yield. The flowering stage was the next most sensitive stage for water deficit. During both cropping seasons, the 33% treatment yielded 51% of the fully irrigated reference. The latter had a significantly higher water productivity than all the deficit treatments. Early-sown soybean had higher yield than the late sown soybean. Sowing as late as early December was found to be still suitable for double cropping without significant yield loss. The result of this study is particularly useful for soybean farmers in water-scarce regions, such as south-eastern Australia, who practice double cropping with a tight cropping calendar.

Keywords: APSIM; Australia; Double cropping; Evapotranspiration; Growth stage; Water stress (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424001501
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:296:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424001501

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108815

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().