Evaluating the tradeoffs between water conservation, aesthetic value, evaporative cooling and CO2 emissions in St. augustinegrass and buffalograss

Jean Claude Iradukunda and Amir Verdi

Agricultural Water Management, 2024, vol. 305, issue C

Abstract: Urban lawns comprise a significant portion of urban greenery and provide several ecosystem services. Nevertheless, maintaining lawns comes with significant water costs in semi-arid inland southern California, as they require consistent irrigation to stay healthy and productive. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a wide range of irrigation rates and frequencies applied autonomously by a smart ET-based controller on the aesthetic value, cooling potential, and CO2 efflux of two warm-season turfgrass species. For three years, we studied the responses of Buffalograss and St. Augustinegrass to six irrigation rates and two irrigation frequencies in Riverside, California. Under historical average climate conditions, the minimum irrigation rate for Buffalograss was 93 % ETo, and for St. Augustinegrass, it was 74 % ETo. Under projected future climate conditions, the estimated minimum irrigation rate for Buffalograss did not change, but for St. Augustinegrass, it increased by 4 % and 7 % in 2100 under low emission (RCP 4.5) and high emission (RCP 8.5) scenarios, respectively. On average, canopy minus air temperature in Buffalograss was 6.2 ℃, and in St. Augustinegrass, it was 1.1 ℃. The average CO2 efflux in Buffalograss was 122.3 µg CO2-C m−2 s−1, and in St. Augustinegrass, it was 182.8 µg CO2-C m−2 s−1. Our results showed that turfgrass aesthetic values, cooling potential, and CO2 efflux diminished as the irrigation rate decreased, but at different rates for each turfgrass species.

Keywords: CO2 efflux; Deficit irrigation; Evapotranspiration; Irrigation frequency; Irrigation rate; Remote sensing; NDVI; Turfgrass water response function (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424004530
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:305:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424004530

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109117

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().