Productivity of water and heat resources and cotton yield response to cropping pattern and planting density in cotton fields in arid area
Zhenlin Dong,
Sumei Wan,
Yunzhen Ma,
Jinbin Wang,
Lu Feng,
Yunlong Zhai,
Tiantian Li,
Zhengjun Cui,
Jian Wang,
Beifang Yang,
Ze Yang,
Zhan Zhao,
Fei Yan,
Shiwu Xiong,
Yabing Li and
Guodong Chen
Agricultural Water Management, 2025, vol. 307, issue C
Abstract:
The individual effects of cropping patterns and planting densities on cotton yield formation and resource utilization have been extensively studied in the arid regions of western China, but research on their combined impacts remains limited. This study hypothesized that optimizing cropping patterns and planting densities would enhance hydrothermal resource productivity and cotton yield in the region. To test this, a two-year field experiment (2022–2023) employed a split-plot design with two main planting patterns (four rows per film and six rows per film) and three planting densities (low, medium, and high) as subplots. Using internet of sensor technology, soil temperature and moisture were monitored to assess their spatial and temporal distributions. The effects of planting pattern, density, and their interactions on cotton yield, yield components, biomass accumulation, and water and heat utilization were evaluated. The interaction between pattern and density significantly influenced cotton yield, harvest index, and water productivity, with planting density exerting a stronger effect on water productivity than planting pattern. In 2023, the four-row pattern at low and medium densities produced higher yields than the high-density treatment. Over the two-year period, the four-row, low-density treatment achieved 8.77 % and 13.40 % greater water productivity than the medium- and high-density treatments, respectively, while the six-row, medium-density treatment outperformed low and high densities, increasing water productivity by 3.64 % and 8.74 %. Seed cotton yield was also higher, with a 2.88 % and 6.15 % increase in the four-row, low-density treatment and an 8.51 % and 4.79 % increase in the six-row, medium-density treatment compared to higher-density treatments. The study further analyzed spatial and temporal variations in soil moisture and temperature and their link to resource productivity and cotton yield. Soil water content differences ranged from 0.10 to 0.90 mm in the four-row pattern and from 0.20 to 0.70 mm in the six-row pattern between low- and high-density treatments. Planting density significantly affected soil temperature during flowering and boll-setting stages. Lint and seed cotton yields showed positive correlations with soil heat production efficiency (PEsoil) and negative correlations with water production efficiency (WPc), with optimal patterns observed in the four-row, low-density and six-row, medium-density treatments. These findings explain why these configurations led to a higher harvest index and enhanced hydrothermal resource productivity. This study provides valuable insights into the optimal configurations for maximizing cotton yield and resource efficiency in arid regions, supporting sustainable cotton production under resource-limited conditions.
Keywords: Soil temperature; Soil moisture; Biomass; Resource utilization; Smart agriculture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037837742400533X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:307:y:2025:i:c:s037837742400533x
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109197
Access Statistics for this article
Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns
More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().