Deficit irrigation and biostimulation preconditioning to improve drought resistance in melon

Susana Zapata-García, Abdelmalek Temnani, Pablo Berríos, Pedro J. Espinosa, Claudia Monllor and Alejandro Pérez-Pastor

Agricultural Water Management, 2025, vol. 309, issue C

Abstract: The need to increase crop water productivity under low water availability conditions, leads not only to the use of technology for real-time soil water monitoring, but also to test the response of certain products, such as algae-based biostimulants, on the agronomy and physiology response of the plants. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of different sustainable strategies to maximize water productivity on melon plants, by monitoring the soil water status using sensors, reduce water inputs in a non-critical period of the melon growth and by preconditioning plants to cope with water stress by the application of a commercial biostimulant based on Ascophyllum nodosum extract, Seamac Rhizo®. With special emphasis on understanding the physiological response that these plants develop to respond to water stress. Four treatments were evaluated: (i) a farmer treatment, irrigated at 100 % ETc, (ii) a precision irrigation (PI) treatment, irrigated with a threshold of 20 % soil water depletion in the active root uptake zone, between flowering and ripening, otherwise irrigated as FARM; (iii) an irrigation suppression (IS) treatment, irrigated as PI for the most of the cycle, except between 42 and 55 days after transplant (swelling of the first fruits), when irrigation was totally suppressed; (iv) a biostimulated irrigation suppression treatment (ISb), irrigated as IS with two applications of biostimulant during vegetative development. Our results indicate that under the severe water deficit applied, melon plants did not reduce their marketable yield with respect to the PI treatment due to leaf osmotic adjustment. Moreover, biostimulated plants (ISb) exhibited an enhanced water root absorption, which enabled them to increase their yield by a 44 % compared to IS treatment. This fact increased the irrigation water productivity by 53 % and 44 % with respect to the PI and IS treatments, respectively. Furthermore, harvested fruits from the biostimulated treatment showed a higher concentration of phenolics compounds compared to PI. Therefore, the incorporation of plant biostimulation is proposed as a sustainable strategy to increase water productivity and enhance functional fruit quality.

Keywords: Abiotic stress; Biostimulant; Hardening; Osmotic adjustment; Priming effect; RDI; Seaweed extracts; Sensorization; WPI (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425000253
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:309:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425000253

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109311

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().