Pathways to balancing water and food for agricultural sustainable development in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China

Jianmei Luo, Ying Guo, Yongqing Qi and Yanjun Shen

Agricultural Water Management, 2025, vol. 310, issue C

Abstract: Groundwater has significantly supported the increase in agricultural output in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region. However, the region has faced severe groundwater depletion for decades. To address this, water conservation in agriculture is considered a key strategy to groundwater decline. However, it is facing with a dilemma to suppress groundwater usage or to pursue agricultural production for food security when considering the criteria for sustainable groundwater use. In this study, we propose a comprehensive water-saving scheme and a planting structure optimisation approach to evaluate the thresholds for the water-food trade-off under various agricultural water conservation scenarios. We investigated, the gains and losses of three main agricultural measures to balancing the groundwater budget: (i) Reducing the planting scale (Sca), (ii) Optimising the planting structure (Str), and (iii) Promoting water-saving technologies (Tec), as well as combined pathways of these water-saving measures. The results showed that: (1) Achieving water conservation goals is challenging when applying a single measure. For example, the effect of water conservation would be 558 million m3 yr−1 by merely optimising the planting structure without reducing the planting scale, whereas the effect would be 527 million m3 yr−1 by solely reducing the planting scale according to farmland conservation plan/goals. (2) Under current water resource conditions in the BTH region, increasing crop water productivity (WP) by 11.5 % could balance the groundwater budget in agriculture, while a 19.2 % increase could achieve balance across all sectors. (3) By employing combined water-saving strategies, including optimising in planting scale/structure and improvements in water-saving technologies, groundwater conservation goals could be met with a 9 % increase in WP, provided that the planting scale and structure are adjusted to meet minimum grain production goals. (4) Two critical thresholds distinguish water-saving pathways, highlighting the marginal effects of investing in technological improvement versus optimising planting scale/structure. These results provide a basis for quantifying critical thresholds in cropping system optimising and provide useful information for similar regions worldwide.

Keywords: Groundwater depletion; Agricultural production; Compound water-saving pathways; Planting scale; Planting structure; Water-saving technology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425000587
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:310:y:2025:i:c:s0378377425000587

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109344

Access Statistics for this article

Agricultural Water Management is currently edited by B.E. Clothier, W. Dierickx, J. Oster and D. Wichelns

More articles in Agricultural Water Management from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().